These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2270757)

  • 1. Vibration sensitivity thresholds: methodological considerations.
    Aaserud O; Juntunen J; Matikainen E
    Acta Neurol Scand; 1990 Oct; 82(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 2270757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold.
    Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensory perception threshold measurement: an evaluation of semiobjective testing devices.
    Halar EM; Hammond MC; LaCava EC; Camann C; Ward J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Aug; 68(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 3619613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utility of vibration sense testing for use in developing countries: comparison of extinction time on the tuning fork to vibration thresholds on the Vibratron II.
    London L; Thompson ML; Capper W; Myers JE
    Neurotoxicology; 2000 Oct; 21(5):743-52. PubMed ID: 11130278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Standardized new method for measuring vibration perception].
    Zamysłowska-Szmytke E; Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Dudarewicz A; Gajda A
    Med Pr; 2001; 52(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 11828844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Normal distributions of thermal and vibration sensory thresholds.
    Bartlett G; Stewart JD; Tamblyn R; Abrahamowicz M
    Muscle Nerve; 1998 Mar; 21(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 9486866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The tuning fork and the at-risk foot.
    Hitman GA
    Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477. PubMed ID: 23151034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative measurement of vibratory perception threshold using a new vibrometer TM-31A.
    Kamon N
    J Occup Med; 1994 Sep; 36(9):989-96. PubMed ID: 7823221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vibration disappearance threshold may be raised by measuring it.
    van Dijk JG; Huyser W; Stijl-Pek M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 1991; 93(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 1665762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory thresholds among construction trade painters: a cross-sectional study using new methods for measuring temperature and vibration sensitivity.
    Bove FJ; Letz R; Baker EL
    J Occup Med; 1989 Apr; 31(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 2785589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Automated Tactile Tester for evaluation of cutaneous sensibility.
    Horch K; Hardy M; Jimenez S; Jabaley M
    J Hand Surg Am; 1992 Sep; 17(5):829-37. PubMed ID: 1401790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A pilot study of reference vibrotactile perception thresholds on the fingertip obtained with Malaysian healthy people using ISO 13091-1 equipment.
    Daud R; Maeda S; Kameel NN; Ripin MY; Bakrun N; Md Zein R; Kido M; Higuchi K
    Ind Health; 2004 Apr; 42(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 15128168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low efficacy using the 256-Hz tuning fork when evaluating the influence of somatosensation in balance control for relatively healthy elderly.
    Hafström A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Oct; 138(10):937-944. PubMed ID: 30113876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of vibration threshold using a biothesiometer compared to a C128-Hz tuning fork.
    Temlett JA
    J Clin Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1435-8. PubMed ID: 19695882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The prevalence and extent of vibration sensitivity impairment in men with chronic ethanol abuse.
    Sosenko JM; Soto R; Aronson J; Kato M; Caralis PV; Ayyar DR
    J Stud Alcohol; 1991 Jul; 52(4):374-6. PubMed ID: 1652043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring vibration sensations with graduated tuning fork. Simple and reliable means to detect diabetic patients at risk of neuropathic foot ulceration.
    Thivolet C; el Farkh J; Petiot A; Simonet C; Tourniaire J
    Diabetes Care; 1990 Oct; 13(10):1077-80. PubMed ID: 2209306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vibration testing: Optimizing methods to improve reliability.
    Marcuzzi A; Wainwright AC; Costa DSJ; Wrigley PJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2019 Feb; 59(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 30390398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability of a widely used test of peripheral cutaneous vibration sensitivity and a comparison of two testing protocols.
    Gerr FE; Letz R
    Br J Ind Med; 1988 Sep; 45(9):635-9. PubMed ID: 3179239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction of automated systems to evaluate touch-pressure, vibration, and thermal cutaneous sensation in man.
    Dyck PJ; Zimmerman IR; O'Brien PC; Ness A; Caskey PE; Karnes J; Bushek W
    Ann Neurol; 1978 Dec; 4(6):502-10. PubMed ID: 742850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensory thresholds at different sites of the foot: a valuable reference for neurologic examinations.
    Zhang JW; Wang Q; Wang XF; Gao MM; Yun XP; Wu HF; Hong Y
    Spinal Cord; 2017 Apr; 55(4):396-398. PubMed ID: 27897183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.