BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2270830)

  • 1. Filter and leak penetration characteristics of a dust and mist filtering facepiece.
    Chen CC; Ruuskanen J; Pilacinski W; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Dec; 51(12):632-9. PubMed ID: 2270830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fit test for filtering facepieces: search for a low-cost, quantitative method.
    Myojo T; Willeke K; Chen CC
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Sep; 55(9):797-805. PubMed ID: 7942513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of particle charge on the performance of a filtering facepiece.
    Chen CC; Huang SH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Apr; 59(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 9586197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a sodium chloride aerosol filter test method to silica-dust and silica-mist filter test methods.
    Lowry PL; Revoir WH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1978 Sep; 39(9):709-16. PubMed ID: 215024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Worst case" aerosol testing parameters: I. Sodium chloride and dioctyl phthalate aerosol filter efficiency as a function of particle size and flow rate.
    Stevens GA; Moyer ES
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):257-64. PubMed ID: 2729101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loading and filtration characteristics of filtering facepieces.
    Chen CC; Lehtimäki M; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1993 Feb; 54(2):51-60. PubMed ID: 8452097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: II. Predictive model.
    Hinds WC; Bellin P
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):842-7. PubMed ID: 3318364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister/cartridge filters.
    Rengasamy S; BerryAnn R; Szalajda J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(9):519-25. PubMed ID: 23927008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Worst-case" aerosol testing parameters: III. Initial penetration of charged and neutralized lead fume and silica dust aerosols through clean, unloaded respirator filters.
    Moyer ES; Stevens GA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 May; 50(5):271-4. PubMed ID: 2543198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a quantitative fit testing method for N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
    Janssen L; Luinenburg MD; Mullins HE; Danisch SG; Nelson TJ
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):480-6. PubMed ID: 12908863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Total inward leakage of nanoparticles through filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Apr; 55(3):253-63. PubMed ID: 21292731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characteristics of face seal leakage in filtering facepieces.
    Chen CC; Willeke K
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Sep; 53(9):533-9. PubMed ID: 1524028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-certified particulate air-purifying filtering facepiece respirators: evaluation by light scattering photometric and particle number-based test methods.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 22239104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the filtration performance of NIOSH-approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators by photometric and number-based test methods.
    Rengasamy S; Miller A; Eimer BC
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 21154105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance of dust respirators with facial seal leaks: I. Experimental.
    Hinds WC; Kraske G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):836-41. PubMed ID: 3687728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride.
    Cho HW; Yoon CS; Lee JH; Lee SJ; Viner A; Johnson EW
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jul; 55(6):666-80. PubMed ID: 21742627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators.
    Rengasamy S; Eimer BC; Shaffer RE
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Mar; 53(2):117-28. PubMed ID: 19261695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of five methods for fit-testing N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Zhuang Z; Campbell DL; Jensen PA; Myers WR
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Oct; 17(10):723-30. PubMed ID: 12363214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
    Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.