These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2270834)

  • 1. The high, medium, and low method--a better noise reduction rating?
    Behar A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Dec; 51(12):659-62. PubMed ID: 2270834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of protector-noise interaction on the accuracy of the NRR estimate of hearing protector attenuation.
    Cluff GL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Apr; 47(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 3706147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Harris DA; Johnson JL; Shaw PB
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 12908866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of noise exposure for indoor and outdoor firing ranges.
    Murphy WJ; Tubbs RL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Sep; 4(9):688-97. PubMed ID: 17654224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency interlaboratory comparison of American National Standards Institute S12.6-1997 Methods A and B.
    Murphy WJ; Byrne DC; Gauger D; Ahroon WA; Berger E; Gerges SN; McKinley R; Witt B; Krieg EF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3262-77. PubMed ID: 19425669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation.
    Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR; Byrne DC; Witt B; Duran J
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):132-41. PubMed ID: 21368438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of noise exposure in a hospital kitchen.
    Achutan C
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(44):145-50. PubMed ID: 19602767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
    Alberti PW; Riko K
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
    Thunder TD; Lankford JE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter-laboratory comparison of three earplug fit-test systems.
    Byrne DC; Murphy WJ; Krieg EF; Ghent RM; Michael KL; Stefanson EW; Ahroon WA
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Apr; 14(4):294-305. PubMed ID: 27786602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise-induced hearing loss.
    McReynolds MC
    Air Med J; 2005; 24(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 15741953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of muff-type hearing protectors as used in a working environment.
    Giardino DA; Durkt G
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Mar; 57(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 8776197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
    Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
    Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suggested standard hearing protector attenuation function relating to the NRR.
    Cluff GL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):776-8. PubMed ID: 3799478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria.
    Sriwattanatamma P; Breysse P
    Am J Ind Med; 2000 Apr; 37(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 10706744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What do we know about hearing protector comfort?
    Davis RR
    Noise Health; 2008; 10(40):83-9. PubMed ID: 19052440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Noise exposure and hearing conservation in U.S. coal mines--a surveillance report.
    Joy GJ; Middendorf PJ
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jan; 4(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 17162478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise-induced hearing loss in agriculture: creating partnerships to overcome barriers and educate the community on prevention.
    Ehlers JJ; Graydon PS
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):142-6. PubMed ID: 21368439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.