These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22708512)

  • 1. Comparing two independent groups: a test based on a one-step M-estimator and bootstrap-t.
    Özdemir AF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):322-37. PubMed ID: 22708512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA based on a modified one-step M-estimator.
    Wilcox RR; Keselman HJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12803819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing.
    van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new and improved two-sample T test.
    Keselman HJ; Othman AR; Wilcox RR; Fradette K
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Jan; 15(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 14717831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New heterogeneous test statistics for the unbalanced fixed-effect nested design.
    Guo JH; Billard L; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):259-76. PubMed ID: 21492132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Designing better graphs by including distributional information and integrating words, numbers, and images.
    Lane DM; Sándor A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):239-57. PubMed ID: 19719360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the regression slopes of independent groups.
    Ng M; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):319-40. PubMed ID: 19807946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bootstrap scree tests: a Monte Carlo simulation and applications to published data.
    Hong S; Mitchell SK; Harshman RA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):35-57. PubMed ID: 16709278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of sampling error and measurement error and its correlation on the estimation of multi-locus fixed-bin VNTR RFLP genotype probabilities.
    Hartmann JM; Houlihan BT; Thompson LD; Chan C; Baldwin RA; Buse EL
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):241-5. PubMed ID: 9068182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robust ANCOVA using a smoother with bootstrap bagging.
    Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):427-37. PubMed ID: 18652737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust step-down tests for multivariate independent group designs.
    Lix LM; Fouladi RT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 Nov; 60(Pt 2):245-65. PubMed ID: 17971269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods for comparing the means of two independent log-normal samples.
    Zhou XH; Gao S; Hui SL
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1129-35. PubMed ID: 9290231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.