These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22708745)

  • 1. Repetition blindness reveals differences between the representations of manipulable and nonmanipulable objects.
    Harris IM; Murray AM; Hayward WG; O'Callaghan C; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1228-41. PubMed ID: 22708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.
    Wamain Y; Pluciennicka E; Kalénine S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():28-37. PubMed ID: 25725356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.
    Kellenbach ML; Brett M; Patterson K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Jan; 15(1):30-46. PubMed ID: 12590841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The function of words: distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects.
    Rueschemeyer SA; van Rooij D; Lindemann O; Willems RM; Bekkering H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1844-51. PubMed ID: 19583471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning Is Better with the Hands Free: The Role of Posture in the Memory of Manipulable Objects.
    Dutriaux L; Gyselinck V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159108. PubMed ID: 27414407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception.
    Kiefer M; Sim EJ; Helbig H; Graf M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1864-74. PubMed ID: 20617882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selectivity for large nonmanipulable objects in scene-selective visual cortex does not require visual experience.
    He C; Peelen MV; Han Z; Lin N; Caramazza A; Bi Y
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 79():1-9. PubMed ID: 23624496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sharpening and formation: two distinct neuronal mechanisms of repetition priming.
    Martens U; Gruber T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 36(7):2989-95. PubMed ID: 22780583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Object identification leads to a conceptual broadening of object representations in lateral prefrontal cortex.
    Gotts SJ; Milleville SC; Martin A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Sep; 76():62-78. PubMed ID: 25445775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of motor congruence on visual working memory.
    Quak M; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Oct; 76(7):2063-70. PubMed ID: 24599737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal position priming: memory traces of recent experience bias the allocation of attention in time.
    Yashar A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1443-56. PubMed ID: 23339347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object-selective cortex exhibits performance-independent repetition suppression.
    Sayres R; Grill-Spector K
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 95(2):995-1007. PubMed ID: 16236787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects.
    Bub DN; Masson ME
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Aug; 141(3):502-17. PubMed ID: 22201414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects.
    McNair NA; Harris IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 22609901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Action-related objects influence the distribution of visuospatial attention.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):669-88. PubMed ID: 21113857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
    Harris IM; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body schematics: on the role of the body schema in embodied lexical-semantic representations.
    Rueschemeyer SA; Pfeiffer C; Bekkering H
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):774-81. PubMed ID: 19782094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.
    Moores E; Laiti L; Chelazzi L
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 6(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12514738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid activation of motor responses by illusory contours.
    Seydell-Greenwald A; Schmidt T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1168-82. PubMed ID: 22686697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.