187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2271021)
1. Superimposition of being: the collision of maternal and fetal rights.
Kolner SJ
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1990; 53(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 2271021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion ethics.
Fromer MJ
Nurs Outlook; 1982 Apr; 30(4):234-40. PubMed ID: 7041095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation.
Blank RH
J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
Callahan D
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An historical perspective on the law of personality and status with special regard to the human fetus and the rights of women.
Curran WJ
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1983; 61(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 6343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Umbilical cords: the new drug connection.
Phillips M
Buffalo Law Rev; 1992; 40(2):525-66. PubMed ID: 11651461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and self-defense.
Davis N
Philos Public Aff; 1984; 13(3):175-207. PubMed ID: 11655659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal abuse and neglect: an emerging controversy.
Landwirth J
Pediatrics; 1987 Apr; 79(4):508-14. PubMed ID: 3822668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fetus as a patient: emerging rights as a person?
Lenow JL
Am J Law Med; 1983; 9(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 6638018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties.
Solomon RI
Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(4):411-34. PubMed ID: 1812768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Consensual sex without assuming the risk of carrying an unwanted fetus; another foundation for the right to an abortion.
Walen A
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1997; 63():1051-140. PubMed ID: 12173635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who gets to choose? Responses to the foetal/maternal conflict.
Hyams R
E Law; 1995 Dec; 2(3):E7. PubMed ID: 16969923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
Gallagher A
St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's rights versus the protection of fetuses.
Warren MA
Midwest Med Ethics; 1991; 7(1):1, 3-7. PubMed ID: 16145788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States.
Jubb ED
Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
McDonagh E
Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Technology and the legal discourse of fetal autonomy.
Morris C
UCLA Womens Law J; 1997; 8(1):47-97. PubMed ID: 16273687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion: getting the ethics straight.
Lebacqz K
Logos (Santa Clara); 1982; 3():47-60. PubMed ID: 11655878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A woman's right to choose: wrongful death statutes and abortion rights--consistent at last.
Siano JR
Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):279-92. PubMed ID: 15871153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal versus maternal rights.
Owens WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 59(5):666-7. PubMed ID: 7070740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
