These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22710619)

  • 1. Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing.
    Heath M; Bell J; Holroyd CB; Krigolson O
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 221(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22710619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.
    Heath M; DeSimone JC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 27405998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antipointing: perception-based visual information renders an offline mode of control.
    Maraj A; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 202(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 20012599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The antipointing task: vector inversion is supported by a perceptual estimate of visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Maddigan M; Binsted G
    J Mot Behav; 2009 Oct; 41(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 19460747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual feedback explains why propointing is better than antipointing in spatial neglect.
    Utz KS; Hesse C; Hintz A; Grüneberger D; Kulke H; Roth I; Klos T; Kromichal V; Melms A; Schupp W; Kohl D; Schenk T
    Cortex; 2018 Jan; 98():114-127. PubMed ID: 28648411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: a review and new evidence from event-related potentials.
    Correa A; Lupiáñez J; Madrid E; Tudela P
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1076(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 16516173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How handedness influences perceptual and attentional processes during rapid serial visual presentation.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Liebrand M; Landmesser J; Verleger R
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jun; 100():155-163. PubMed ID: 28456522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
    Kiat JE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task performance in covert, but not overt, attention correlates with early laterality of visual evoked potentials.
    Hilo-Merkovich R; Carrasco M; Yuval-Greenberg S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():330-339. PubMed ID: 30125589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural basis of superior performance of action videogame players in an attention-demanding task.
    Mishra J; Zinni M; Bavelier D; Hillyard SA
    J Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 31(3):992-8. PubMed ID: 21248123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological indices of spatial attention during global/local processing in good and poor phonological decoders.
    Matthews AJ; Martin FH
    Brain Lang; 2009 Dec; 111(3):152-60. PubMed ID: 19828188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antipointing Reaches Do Not Adhere to Width-Based Manipulations of Fitts' (1954) Equation.
    Pecora M; Tremblay L; Heath M
    Motor Control; 2019 Nov; 24(2):222-237. PubMed ID: 31693993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Gradkowski A; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 18982320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does spatial attention modulate the earliest component of the visual evoked potential?
    Baumgartner HM; Graulty CJ; Hillyard SA; Pitts MA
    Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 9(1-2):4-19. PubMed ID: 28534668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of involuntary auditory attention on visual task performance and brain activity.
    Alho K; Escera C; Díaz R; Yago E; Serra JM
    Neuroreport; 1997 Oct; 8(15):3233-7. PubMed ID: 9351649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of temporal predictability on exogenous attentional modulation of feedforward processing in the striate cortex.
    Dassanayake TL; Michie PT; Fulham R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Jul; 105():9-16. PubMed ID: 27114044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human visual system automatically encodes sequential regularities of discrete events.
    Kimura M; Schröger E; Czigler I; Ohira H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1124-39. PubMed ID: 19583466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.