BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2271062)

  • 1. The cellular basis of memory.
    McNaughton BL; Foster TC
    Science; 1990 Sep; 249(4976):1487. PubMed ID: 2271062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Natural chemicals, synthetic chemicals, risk assessment, and cancer.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    Princess Takamatsu Symp; 1990; 21():303-14. PubMed ID: 2134684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal cancer tests and cancer prevention.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1992; (12):125-32. PubMed ID: 1616796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dietary pesticides (99.99% all natural).
    Ames BN; Profet M; Gold LS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1990 Oct; 87(19):7777-81. PubMed ID: 2217210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental pollution, pesticides, and the prevention of cancer: misconceptions.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    FASEB J; 1997 Nov; 11(13):1041-52. PubMed ID: 9367339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chemical carcinogenesis: too many rodent carcinogens.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1990 Oct; 87(19):7772-6. PubMed ID: 2217209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rodent carcinogens: setting priorities.
    Gold LS; Slone TH; Stern BR; Manley NB; Ames BN
    Science; 1992 Oct; 258(5080):261-5. PubMed ID: 1411524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The causes and prevention of cancer: gaining perspective.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    Environ Health Perspect; 1997 Jun; 105 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):865-73. PubMed ID: 9255573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The prevention of cancer.
    Ames BN; Gold LS
    Drug Metab Rev; 1998 May; 30(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 9606601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nature's chemicals and synthetic chemicals: comparative toxicology.
    Ames BN; Profet M; Gold LS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1990 Oct; 87(19):7782-6. PubMed ID: 2217211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status.
    Box RJ; Spielmann H
    Arch Toxicol; 2005 Nov; 79(11):615-26. PubMed ID: 15940470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Erratum.
    Science; 1991 Feb; 251(4994):608. PubMed ID: 17741358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do pesticides reduce our total exposure to food borne toxicants?
    Mattsson JL
    Neurotoxicology; 2000; 21(1-2):195-202. PubMed ID: 10794400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dietary intake of pesticide chemicals. Calculated daily consumption of pesticides with foods are discussed and compared with currently accepted values.
    Duggan RE; Weatherwax JR
    Science; 1967 Sep; 157(3792):1006-10. PubMed ID: 4166636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ames, pesticides, and cancer revisited.
    Richter ED; Chlamtac N
    Int J Occup Environ Health; 2002; 8(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 11843442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo erythrocyte micronucleus and transgenic rodent gene mutation tests to detect rodent carcinogens.
    Morita T; Hamada S; Masumura K; Wakata A; Maniwa J; Takasawa H; Yasunaga K; Hashizume T; Honma M
    Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 May; 802():1-29. PubMed ID: 27169373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.