184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22711447)
1. On the accuracy of localization achievable in fiducial-based stereoscopic image registration system using an electronic portal imaging device.
Ung NM; Wee L
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2012 Jun; 35(2):205-13. PubMed ID: 22711447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards clinical implementation of ultrafast combined kV-MV CBCT for IGRT of lung cancer : Evaluation of registration accuracy based on phantom study.
Arns A; Blessing M; Fleckenstein J; Stsepankou D; Boda-Heggemann J; Simeonova-Chergou A; Hesser J; Lohr F; Wenz F; Wertz H
Strahlenther Onkol; 2016 May; 192(5):312-21. PubMed ID: 26864049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image-guided localization accuracy of stereoscopic planar and volumetric imaging methods for stereotactic radiation surgery and stereotactic body radiation therapy: a phantom study.
Kim J; Jin JY; Walls N; Nurushev T; Movsas B; Chetty IJ; Ryu S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Apr; 79(5):1588-96. PubMed ID: 20832184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of implanted gold fiducial markers with MV-CBCT image-guided IMRT for pancreatic tumours.
Packard M; Gayou O; Gurram K; Weiss B; Thakkar S; Kirichenko A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Aug; 59(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 25754023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of prostate positioning guided by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and cone beam CT.
Li M; Ballhausen H; Hegemann NS; Reiner M; Tritschler S; Gratzke C; Manapov F; Corradini S; Ganswindt U; Belka C
Strahlenther Onkol; 2017 Mar; 193(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 27928626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An accuracy assessment of different rigid body image registration methods and robotic couch positional corrections using a novel phantom.
Arumugam S; Jameson MG; Xing A; Holloway L
Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031701. PubMed ID: 23464296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue feature-based intra-fractional motion tracking for stereoscopic x-ray image guided radiotherapy.
Xie Y; Xing L; Gu J; Liu W
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jun; 58(11):3615-30. PubMed ID: 23648334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of low-dose, half-rotation, cone-beam CT with electronic portal imaging device for registration of fiducial markers during prostate radiotherapy.
Ung NM; Wee L; Hackett SL; Jones A; Lim TS; Harper CS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 14(4):4249. PubMed ID: 23835391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of CT cone-beam geometry using a novel method insensitive to phantom fabrication inaccuracy: implications for isocenter localization accuracy.
Ford JC; Zheng D; Williamson JF
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):2829-40. PubMed ID: 21815358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of localization uncertainty of fiducial markers due to length and position variations induced by motion in CT imaging by measurement and modeling.
Ali I; Alsbou N; Oyewale S; Jaskowiak J; Ahmad S; Algan O
Gulf J Oncolog; 2016 May; 1(21):21-9. PubMed ID: 27250884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of spherical fiducial localization in C-arm cone-beam CT using patient data.
Yaniv Z
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5298-305. PubMed ID: 21089764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fiducial markers configuration optimization in image-guided surgery.
Bao N; Chen Y; Yue Y; Li H; Cui Z; Zhuang J; Tian S; Kang Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3361-71. PubMed ID: 25227046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of cone beam CT coincidence with megavoltage isocentre and image sharpness using the QUASAR Penta-Guide phantom.
Sykes JR; Lindsay R; Dean CJ; Brettle DS; Magee DR; Thwaites DI
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5275-93. PubMed ID: 18758000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration of CT to 3D ultrasound using near-field fiducial localization: A feasibility study.
Kingma R; Rohling RN; Nguan C
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(2):54-70. PubMed ID: 21322745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of automatic image registration uncertainty for three IGRT systems using a male pelvis phantom.
Barber J; Sykes JR; Holloway L; Thwaites DI
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):283-292. PubMed ID: 27685137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of cone beam CT registration for prostate radiation therapy: fiducial marker and soft tissue methods.
Deegan T; Owen R; Holt T; Fielding A; Biggs J; Parfitt M; Coates A; Roberts L
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 59(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24953244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Registration of electronic portal images for patient set-up verification.
Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Delibasis KK; Kouloulias V; Uzunoglu N; Karaiskos P; Sandilos P
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):3279-89. PubMed ID: 15357197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary studies for a CBCT imaging protocol for offline organ motion analysis: registration software validation and CTDI measurements.
Falco MD; Fontanarosa D; Miceli R; Carosi A; Santoni R; D'Andrea M
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 20363613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of image co-registration accuracy for frameless gamma knife surgery.
Chung HT; Kim JH; Kim JW; Paek SH; Kim DG; Chun KJ; Kim TH; Kim YK
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193809. PubMed ID: 29499061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A phantom study to evaluate three different registration platform of 3D/3D, 2D/3D, and 3D surface match with 6D alignment for precise image-guided radiotherapy.
Kuo HC; Lovelock MM; Li G; Ballangrud Å; Wolthuis B; Della Biancia C; Hunt MA; Berry SL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 21(12):188-196. PubMed ID: 33184966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
