BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22711593)

  • 1. Computational detection of protein complexes in AP-MS experiments.
    Choi H
    Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1663-8. PubMed ID: 22711593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The bait compatibility index: computational bait selection for interaction proteomics experiments.
    Saha S; Kaur P; Ewing RM
    J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):4972-81. PubMed ID: 20731387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Affinity-purification coupled to mass spectrometry: basic principles and strategies.
    Dunham WH; Mullin M; Gingras AC
    Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1576-90. PubMed ID: 22611051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resolving protein interactions and complexes by affinity purification followed by label-based quantitative mass spectrometry.
    Trinkle-Mulcahy L
    Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1623-38. PubMed ID: 22610586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A high-accuracy consensus map of yeast protein complexes reveals modular nature of gene essentiality.
    Hart GT; Lee I; Marcotte ER
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():236. PubMed ID: 17605818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From pull-down data to protein interaction networks and complexes with biological relevance.
    Zhang B; Park BH; Karpinets T; Samatova NF
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(7):979-86. PubMed ID: 18304937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protein complex prediction based on simultaneous protein interaction network.
    Jung SH; Hyun B; Jang WH; Hur HY; Han DS
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 26(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 19965885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A sampling framework for incorporating quantitative mass spectrometry data in protein interaction analysis.
    Tucker G; Loh PR; Berger B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Oct; 14():299. PubMed ID: 24093595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactome mapping for analysis of complex phenotypes: insights from benchmarking binary interaction assays.
    Braun P
    Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1499-518. PubMed ID: 22589225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Network inference from AP-MS data: computational challenges and solutions.
    Teng B; Zhao C; Liu X; He Z
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 Jul; 16(4):658-74. PubMed ID: 25378435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry coupled techniques.
    Abu-Farha M; Elisma F; Figeys D
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2008; 110():67-80. PubMed ID: 18227982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unraveling the dynamics of protein interactions with quantitative mass spectrometry.
    Ramisetty SR; Washburn MP
    Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol; 2011 Jun; 46(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 21438726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incorporating high-throughput proteomics experiments into structural biology pipelines: identification of the low-hanging fruits.
    Pache RA; Aloy P
    Proteomics; 2008 May; 8(10):1959-64. PubMed ID: 18491310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein complex and protein interaction network assembly.
    Sardiu ME; Florens L; Washburn MP
    J Proteome Res; 2009 Jun; 8(6):2944-52. PubMed ID: 19317493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of protein complexes from affinity purification/mass spectrometry data.
    Cai B; Wang H; Zheng H; Wang H
    BMC Syst Biol; 2012; 6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. PubMed ID: 23282282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks.
    Han JD; Dupuy D; Bertin N; Cusick ME; Vidal M
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):839-44. PubMed ID: 16003372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational and informatics strategies for identification of specific protein interaction partners in affinity purification mass spectrometry experiments.
    Nesvizhskii AI
    Proteomics; 2012 May; 12(10):1639-55. PubMed ID: 22611043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources.
    Bader GD; Hogue CW
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):991-7. PubMed ID: 12355115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaction proteomics: characterization of protein complexes using tandem affinity purification-mass spectrometry.
    Völkel P; Le Faou P; Angrand PO
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2010 Aug; 38(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 20658971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identification of Protein Complexes from Tandem Affinity Purification/Mass Spectrometry Data via Biased Random Walk.
    Cai B; Wang H; Zheng H; Wang H
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(2):455-66. PubMed ID: 26357231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.