BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22711786)

  • 1. Impact of hysterectomy on the age-specific incidence of cervical and uterine cancer in Germany and other countries.
    Stang A
    Eur J Public Health; 2013 Oct; 23(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 22711786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The temporal and age-dependent patterns of hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer incidence rates in Denmark: a population-based cohort study.
    Hammer A; Kahlert J; Rositch A; Pedersen L; Gravitt P; Blaakaer J; Soegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 27861705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates by age and indication in Germany 2005-2006.
    Stang A; Merrill RM; Kuss O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1193-200. PubMed ID: 22718096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of cervical and uterine cancers in Massachusetts, 1995 to 2010.
    Stang A; Hawk H; Knowlton R; Gershman ST; Kuss O
    Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 24(11):849-54. PubMed ID: 25241148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk estimates of hysterectomy and selected conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy.
    Merrill RM; Layman AB; Oderda G; Asche C
    Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18280923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterectomy prevalence and death rates for cervical cancer--United States, 1965-1988.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 Jan; 41(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 1728728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased age and race-specific incidence of cervical cancer after correction for hysterectomy prevalence in the United States from 2000 to 2009.
    Rositch AF; Nowak RG; Gravitt PE
    Cancer; 2014 Jul; 120(13):2032-8. PubMed ID: 24821088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The rising frequency of hysterectomy: its effect on uterine cancer rates.
    Lyon JL; Gardner JW
    Am J Epidemiol; 1977 May; 105(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 860706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland.
    Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzaga G; Brewster DH; Wild SH; Sivalingam VN
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 59():227-231. PubMed ID: 30836220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales.
    Redburn JC; Murphy MF
    BJOG; 2001 Apr; 108(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 11305546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark.
    Lam JU; Lynge E; Njor SH; Rebolj M
    Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 25800858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States.
    Beavis AL; Gravitt PE; Rositch AF
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. State-level uterine corpus cancer incidence rates corrected for hysterectomy prevalence, 2004 to 2008.
    Siegel RL; Devesa SS; Cokkinides V; Ma J; Jemal A
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2013 Jan; 22(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23125334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2004.
    Wong CA; Jim MA; King J; Tom-Orme L; Henderson JA; Saraiya M; Richardson LC; Layne L; Suryaprasad A; Espey DK
    Cancer Causes Control; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1681-9. PubMed ID: 21984306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of total hysterectomy in a cervical cancer screening population: a register-based cross-sectional study.
    Larsen MB; Mikkelsen EM; Jeppesen U; Svanholm H; Andersen B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jun; 17(1):423. PubMed ID: 28633673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Participation in cervical cancer screening by age and region--a cohort study with a 3 1/2 year follow-up on 2,223,135 women in Bavaria.
    Rückinger S; Tauscher M; Redel R; Munte A; Walchner-Bonjean M; Hess J; Schneider A; von Kries R
    Gesundheitswesen; 2008 Jun; 70(6):e17-21. PubMed ID: 18661453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk-adjusted cancer-incidence rates (United States).
    Merrill RM; Feuer EJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 1996 Sep; 7(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 8877053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent trends in recorded incidence and mortality from uterine cancer.
    Gallagher RP; Elwood JM
    Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1982; 62():83-7. PubMed ID: 7167199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global epidemiology of hysterectomy: possible impact on gynecological cancer rates.
    Hammer A; Rositch AF; Kahlert J; Gravitt PE; Blaakaer J; Søgaard M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):23-29. PubMed ID: 25724402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.