These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2271259)

  • 1. Validation of a method for the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infection suitable for use in general practice.
    Hiscoke C; Yoxall H; Greig D; Lightfoot NF
    Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Oct; 40(339):403-5. PubMed ID: 2271259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of microscopical and chemical tests for the rapid diagnosis of urinary tract infections in general practice.
    Ditchburn RK; Ditchburn JS
    Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Oct; 40(339):406-8. PubMed ID: 2271260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic accuracy of the rapid dipstick test to predict asymptomatic urinary tract infection of pregnancy.
    Eigbefoh JO; Isabu P; Okpere E; Abebe J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jul; 28(5):490-5. PubMed ID: 18850421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quantitative urine microscopic examination using disposable counting chamber for diagnosis of urinary tract infection].
    Hida Y; Yamashita M; Gejyo F; Hiraoka M; Hori C; Sudo M
    Rinsho Byori; 1995 Dec; 43(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 8569040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of rapid dipstick tests to exclude urinary tract infection in children.
    Sharief N; Hameed M; Petts D
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1998 Dec; 55(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 10436538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for urinary tract infections in a gynaecological setting: validity and cost-effectiveness of reagent strips.
    Preston A; O'Donnell T; Phillips CA
    Br J Biomed Sci; 1999; 56(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 10795368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Can we rely on the results of urine microscopy and culture when tests are performed in general practice?].
    Bjerrum L; Grinsted P; Søgaard P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Apr; 164(14):1927-30. PubMed ID: 11957428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of a screening test for urinary infection].
    Audurier A; Burdin JC; Darbas H; Kohler F; Laudat P; Mayeux D; Pavis A
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1988 Sep; 36(7):921-4. PubMed ID: 3059278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of urinary tract infection (UTI) in long-term care setting: Is the multireagent strip an adequate diagnostic tool?
    Arinzon Z; Peisakh A; Shuval I; Shabat S; Berner YN
    Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2009; 48(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 18314207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reagent strip testing is not sensitive for the screening of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women.
    Lumbiganon P; Chongsomchai C; Chumworathayee B; Thinkhamrop J
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Aug; 85(8):922-7. PubMed ID: 12403214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of Clinitek in the screening and optimisation of the diagnosis of urinary tract infection].
    Laudat P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1991; 49(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2064081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reagent strip screening for sediment abnormalities identified by automated microscopy in urine from patients suspected to have urinary tract disease.
    Bartlett RC; Zern DA; Ratkiewicz I; Tetreault JZ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Nov; 118(11):1096-101. PubMed ID: 7979894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reagent strip testing for antenatal screening and first meaningful of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women.
    Kovavisarach E; Vichaipruck M; Kanjanahareutai S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Dec; 91(12):1786-90. PubMed ID: 19133509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points.
    Lammers RL; Gibson S; Kovacs D; Sears W; Strachan G
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 11679861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Predictive value of reactive strips in urinary infection].
    Pinto MF; Silva CM
    Acta Med Port; 2001; 14(5-6):457-8. PubMed ID: 11878154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Clinical evaluation of nitrite test for the detection of bacteriuria].
    Ozeki S; Kawamura T; Nishino Y; Ishihara S; Ban Y; Kawada Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1997 Dec; 43(12):861-5. PubMed ID: 9488933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Is urine examination in urinary tract infection superfluous?].
    Steurer J
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 May; 86(22):943-5. PubMed ID: 9289792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid methods in microbiology for in-office testing.
    Needham CA
    Clin Lab Med; 1986 Jun; 6(2):291-304. PubMed ID: 3522076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Diagnosis of urinary tract infections in general practice. I. A testing of Sensicult and the standardized disc diffusion method].
    Gunnes M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1986 Jan; 106(3):221-3. PubMed ID: 3952711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What do general practitioners do when patients present with symptoms indicative of urinary tract infections?
    McLeod D; Kljakovic M
    N Z Med J; 1998 May; 111(1066):189-91. PubMed ID: 9640319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.