These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22713016)

  • 1. Vowel enhancement effects in cochlear-implant users.
    Wang N; Kreft H; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):EL421-6. PubMed ID: 22713016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M; Demany L; Meyer B; Pressnitzer D
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual fusion of polyphonic pitch in cochlear implant users.
    Donnelly PJ; Guo BZ; Limb CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):EL128-33. PubMed ID: 19894787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map.
    Svirsky MA; Silveira A; Neuburger H; Teoh SW; Suárez H
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 15224858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of acoustic cues by children with cochlear implants.
    Giezen MR; Escudero P; Baker A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1440-57. PubMed ID: 20689031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users.
    Champoux F; Lepore F; Gagné JP; Théoret H
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18824184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Thai-Van H; Veuillet E; Norena A; Guiraud J; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancement of temporal cues to pitch in cochlear implants: effects on pitch ranking.
    Vandali AE; van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):392-402. PubMed ID: 22779486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induced Loudness Reduction and Enhancement in Acoustic and Electric Hearing.
    Wang N; Kreft H; Oxenham AJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Aug; 17(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 27033086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T; Böhme L; Götze G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.
    Feng L; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):552. PubMed ID: 30180692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enhancement of neural stochastic firing in cochlear implant stimulation by the addition of noise: a computational study of the influence of stimulation settings and spontaneous activity.
    Paglialonga A; Fiocchi S; Ravazzani P; Tognola G
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Jun; 40(6):597-606. PubMed ID: 20471638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory stream segregation of tone sequences in cochlear implant listeners.
    Cooper HR; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2007 Mar; 225(1-2):11-24. PubMed ID: 17257790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory cortical activation and speech perception in cochlear implant users: effects of implant experience and duration of deafness.
    Green KM; Julyan PJ; Hastings DL; Ramsden RT
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):184-92. PubMed ID: 15953527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of sentence stress in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Wagner P; Walger M
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 21187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant.
    Pauka CK
    J Laryngol Otol Suppl; 1989; 19():1-31. PubMed ID: 2693565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of centrifugal pathways on responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to signals in noise.
    Mulders WH; Seluakumaran K; Robertson D
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 27(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 18279322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.