56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2271349)
21. Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound.
Stamm RB; Martin RP
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 2(4):707-18. PubMed ID: 6886232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of statistical methods for the analysis or interval related cardiac performance variations during cardiac arrhythmia in man.
Pfeiffer KP; Kenner T; Schaefer J
Cardiovasc Res; 1984 Feb; 18(2):80-98. PubMed ID: 6697341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nomogram for calculation of stenotic cardiac valve areas from cardiac output and mean transvalvular gradient.
Nigri A; Martuscelli E; Mangieri E; Voci P; Danesi A; Sardella R; Feroci L; Reale A
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1984; 10(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 6509546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cardiac valve orifice equation independent of valvular flow intervals: application to mitral valve area computation in mitral stenosis and comparison with the Gorlin formula and direct anatomical measurements.
Seitz W; Marino P; Zanolla L; Buonanno C; McIlroy M; Spiel M
Cardiovasc Res; 1984 Nov; 18(11):669-74. PubMed ID: 6498874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Factors affecting accuracy of in vitro valvar pressure gradient estimates by Doppler ultrasound.
Vasko SD; Goldberg SJ; Requarth JA; Allen HD
Am J Cardiol; 1984 Oct; 54(7):893-6. PubMed ID: 6486042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of increasing frequency of contraction on the force velocity relation of left ventricle.
Covell JW; Ross J; Taylor R; Sonnenblick EH; Braunwald E
Cardiovasc Res; 1967 Jan; 1(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 6060158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Alterations in resting length-tension relations of cardiac muscle induced by changes in contractile force.
Sonnenblick EH; Ross J; Covell JW; Braunwald E
Circ Res; 1966 Nov; 19(5):980-8. PubMed ID: 5954130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Hemodynamic effects of exercise, catecholamine stimulation and tachycardia in mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm at comparable heart rates.
Nakhjavan FK; Katz MR; Shedrovilzky H; Maranhao V; Goldberg H
Am J Cardiol; 1969 May; 23(5):659-66. PubMed ID: 5771034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of varying pulse interval in atrial fibrillation on left ventricular function in man.
Gibson DG; Broder G; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1971 May; 33(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 5579156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Determination of valvular pressure gradients by visual comparison of areas.
Potanin C; Jackson DH; Burdeshaw J
J Appl Physiol; 1970 Nov; 29(5):717-9. PubMed ID: 5474866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors influencing the ejection fraction and the mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening during atrial fibrillation in man.
Karliner JS; Gault JH; Bouchard RJ; Holzer J
Cardiovasc Res; 1974 Jan; 8(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 4819485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Revision of Gorlin constant for calculation of mitral valve area from left heart pressures.
Hammermeister KE; Murray JA; Blackmon JR
Br Heart J; 1973 Apr; 35(4):392-6. PubMed ID: 4702370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve area.
Cohen MV; Gorlin R
Am Heart J; 1972 Dec; 84(6):839-40. PubMed ID: 4669905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Haemodynamic effects of atrial pacing in rheumatic mitral stenosis.
Manchanda SC; Ramesh L; Roy SB
Br Heart J; 1974 Jul; 36(7):636-40. PubMed ID: 4413621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Heart rate influence on the systolic gradient across the stenotic aortic valve: theoretical evaluation and implications.
Rozenman Y; Gotsman MS
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 4064113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula.
Cannon SR; Richards KL; Crawford M
Circulation; 1985 Jun; 71(6):1170-8. PubMed ID: 3995711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hemodynamic evaluation of stenotic cardiac valves: II. Modification of the simplified valve formula for mitral and aortic valve area calculation.
Angel J; Soler-Soler J; Anivarro I; Domingo E
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1985; 11(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 3986898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The usefulness of dobutamine in the assessment of the severity of mitral stenosis.
Hwang MH; Pacold I; Piao ZE; Engelmeier R; Scanlon PJ; Loeb HS
Am Heart J; 1986 Feb; 111(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 3946174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing the severity of valve stenosis.
Odemuyiwa O; Hall RJ
Br Heart J; 1986 Feb; 55(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 3942645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Echocardiography in mitral valve disease: a review.
Graf JH; Meltzer R
Int J Card Imaging; 1985; 1(3):189-205. PubMed ID: 3916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
