These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. van Assen M; De Cecco CN; Eid M; von Knebel Doeberitz P; Scarabello M; Lavra F; Bauer MJ; Mastrodicasa D; Duguay TM; Zaki B; Lo GG; Choe YH; Wang Y; Sahbaee P; Tesche C; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(3):26-33. PubMed ID: 30796003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epicardial adipose tissue and myocardial ischemia assessed by computed tomography perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve. Muthalaly RG; Nerlekar N; Wong DT; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 28089233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR? Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Four-dimensional image processing of myocardial CT perfusion for improved image quality and noise reduction. Otton JM; Kühl JT; Kofoed KF; McCrohon J; Feneley M; Sammel N; Yu CY; Chiribiri A; Nagel E J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 23622505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis. Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging in a large animal model: comparison of dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions. Schwarz F; Hinkel R; Baloch E; Marcus RP; Hildebrandt K; Sandner TA; Kupatt C; Hoffmann V; Wintersperger BJ; Reiser MF; Theisen D; Nikolaou K; Bamberg F JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1229-38. PubMed ID: 24269264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]