These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22714549)

  • 1. Optimal timing for first-pass stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Bischoff B; Bamberg F; Marcus R; Schwarz F; Becker HC; Becker A; Reiser M; Nikolaou K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Feb; 29(2):435-42. PubMed ID: 22714549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs
    Williams MC; Mirsadraee S; Dweck MR; Weir NW; Fletcher A; Lucatelli C; MacGillivray T; Golay SK; Cruden NL; Henriksen PA; Uren N; McKillop G; Lima JA; Reid JH; van Beek EJ; Patel D; Newby DE
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1114-1124. PubMed ID: 27334015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantified dual energy computed tomography perfusion imaging using myocardial iodine concentration: Validation using CT derived myocardial blood flow and invasive fractional flow reserve in a porcine model.
    Poulter R; Wood DA; Starovoytov A; Smith S; Chitsaz M; Mayo J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 30718182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Choo KS; Hwangbo L; Kim JH; Park YH; Kim JS; Kim J; Chun KJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ
    Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 23550182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal timing of image acquisition for arterial first pass CT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Pelgrim GJ; Nieuwenhuis ER; Duguay TM; van der Geest RJ; Varga-Szemes A; Slump CH; Fuller SR; Oudkerk M; Schoepf UJ; Vliegenthart R
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():227-233. PubMed ID: 28027752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.
    Pontone G; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Mushtaq S; Baggiano A; Beltrama V; Trabattoni D; Ferrari C; Calligaris G; Teruzzi G; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 27050025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
    Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis.
    Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic impact of coronary stenosis using computed tomography: comparison between noninvasive fractional flow reserve and 3D fusion of coronary angiography with stress myocardial perfusion.
    Patel AR; Maffessanti F; Patel MB; Kebed K; Narang A; Singh A; Medvedofsky D; Zaidi SJ; Mediratta A; Goyal N; Kachenoura N; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 35(9):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 31073698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
    Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease.
    van Assen M; De Cecco CN; Eid M; von Knebel Doeberitz P; Scarabello M; Lavra F; Bauer MJ; Mastrodicasa D; Duguay TM; Zaki B; Lo GG; Choe YH; Wang Y; Sahbaee P; Tesche C; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(3):26-33. PubMed ID: 30796003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epicardial adipose tissue and myocardial ischemia assessed by computed tomography perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve.
    Muthalaly RG; Nerlekar N; Wong DT; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 28089233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CT myocardial perfusion and coronary CT angiography: Influence of coronary calcium on a stress-rest protocol.
    Ladeiras-Lopes R; Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Sampaio F; Pires-Morais G; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Gama V
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 26869367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR?
    Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Four-dimensional image processing of myocardial CT perfusion for improved image quality and noise reduction.
    Otton JM; Kühl JT; Kofoed KF; McCrohon J; Feneley M; Sammel N; Yu CY; Chiribiri A; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 23622505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of FFR-derived from CT and stress perfusion CMR with invasive FFR in intermediate-grade coronary artery stenosis.
    Ghekiere O; Bielen J; Leipsic J; Dewilde W; Mancini I; Hansen D; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):559-568. PubMed ID: 30284138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Myocardial CT perfusion imaging in a large animal model: comparison of dynamic versus single-phase acquisitions.
    Schwarz F; Hinkel R; Baloch E; Marcus RP; Hildebrandt K; Sandner TA; Kupatt C; Hoffmann V; Wintersperger BJ; Reiser MF; Theisen D; Nikolaou K; Bamberg F
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 6(12):1229-38. PubMed ID: 24269264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.