163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22714646)
1. Tutorial in biostatistics: sample sizes for parallel group clinical trials with binary data.
Julious SA; Campbell MJ
Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(24):2904-36. PubMed ID: 22714646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data.
Julious SA
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(12):1921-86. PubMed ID: 15195324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e141-6. PubMed ID: 21967951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of methods for sample size estimation for non-inferiority studies with binary outcomes.
Julious SA; Owen RJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Dec; 20(6):595-612. PubMed ID: 20889572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
Daimon T
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Equivalence and superiority testing in regeneration clinical trials.
Gunsolley JC; Elswick RK; Davenport JM
J Periodontol; 1998 May; 69(5):521-7. PubMed ID: 9623894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size estimation for non-inferiority trials of time-to-event data.
Crisp A; Curtis P
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(4):236-44. PubMed ID: 17583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conditional power calculations for clinical trials with historical controls.
Korn EL; Freidlin B
Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2922-31. PubMed ID: 16479548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the response rates for superiority, noninferiority and equivalence testing with multiple-to-one matched binary data.
Tsong Y; Yuan M; Dong X; Wu YT; Shen M
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 23331224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials.
Flight L; Julious SA
Pharm Stat; 2016; 15(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 26604186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A framework for two-stage adaptive procedures to simultaneously test non-inferiority and superiority.
Koyama T; Sampson AR; Gleser LJ
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2439-56. PubMed ID: 15977285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A practical comparison of blinded methods for sample size reviews in survival data clinical trials.
Todd S; Valdés-Márquez E; West J
Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 22337635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Conducting a cost-effectiveness trial in oncology: justification and method].
Lejeune C; Binquet C; Bonnetain F
Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 19435689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple-arm superiority and non-inferiority designs with various endpoints.
Chang M
Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 17323311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of multiple testing procedures for the gold standard non-inferiority trial.
Röhmel J; Pigeot I
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Sep; 20(5):911-26. PubMed ID: 20721781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculation of sample size for stroke trials assessing functional outcome: comparison of binary and ordinal approaches.
Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration
Int J Stroke; 2008 May; 3(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 18705999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biostatistics in clinical trials: Part 2. Determining sample sizes for clinical trials.
Ellenberg SS
Oncology (Williston Park); 1989 Aug; 3(8):39-46; discussion 48, 51. PubMed ID: 2519197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimates, power and sample size calculations for two-sample ordinal outcomes under before-after study designs.
Strickland PA; Lu SE
Stat Med; 2003 Jun; 22(11):1807-18. PubMed ID: 12754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
