88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22717123)
1. Is transvaginal elastography useful in pre-operative diagnosis of cervical cancer?
Sun LT; Ning CP; Liu YJ; Wang ZZ; Wang LD; Kong XC; Tian JW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e888-92. PubMed ID: 22717123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions.
Lu R; Xiao Y; Liu M; Shi D
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 24658946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer.
Ma X; Li Q; Wang JL; Shao J; Zhu YC; Ding W; Zhang HS; Wang HY; Shen JK
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 28211804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional transvaginal tomographic ultrasound imaging for cervical cancer staging.
Han XS; Ning CP; Sun LT; Li XY; Peng YQ; Dang MZ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2303-9. PubMed ID: 26070421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of real time elastography strain ratio in the assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer using a reference material.
Dudea-Simon M; Dudea SM; Burde A; Ciortea R; Malutan A; Mihu D
Med Ultrason; 2020 May; 22(2):145-151. PubMed ID: 32399523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identification of benign and malignant endometrial cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography combined with elastography and tissue hardness analysis.
Zhang Y; Luo L; Luo Q
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2015; 29(4):905-12. PubMed ID: 26753655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of transvaginal sonoelastography for differential diagnosis between malignant and benign cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu Y; Leng XF; Zhang GN; Huang ZY; Qiu L; Huang W
Cancer Med; 2020 Nov; 9(21):7943-7953. PubMed ID: 32869506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale.
Zhi H; Xiao XY; Yang HY; Ou B; Wen YL; Luo BM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Oct; 17(10):1227-33. PubMed ID: 20650662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of strain ratio in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules.
Ning CP; Jiang SQ; Zhang T; Sun LT; Liu YJ; Tian JW
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 21237598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Elastography in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes prior to dissection.
Tourasse C; Dénier JF; Awada A; Gratadour AC; Nessah-Bousquet K; Gay J
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3154-9. PubMed ID: 22656671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of strain ratio with elastography score system in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules.
Wang H; Brylka D; Sun LN; Lin YQ; Sui GQ; Gao J
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 23206607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Pre-malignant Lesions of the Uterine Cervix by Shear Wave Elastography: A New Diagnostic Tool.
Sainz JA; Castro L; Romo JM; Holgado A; Fernández-Palacín A; García-Mejido JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 47(11):3275-3282. PubMed ID: 34376298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonoelastography of breast lesions: a prospective study of 215 cases with histopathological correlation.
Gheonea IA; Donoiu L; Camen D; Popescu FC; Bondari S
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2011; 52(4):1209-14. PubMed ID: 22203924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
