These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22717167)

  • 1. Updating: learning versus supposing.
    Zhao J; Crupi V; Tentori K; Fitelson B; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2012 Sep; 124(3):373-8. PubMed ID: 22717167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unsupervised statistical learning underpins computational, behavioural, and neural manifestations of musical expectation.
    Pearce MT; Ruiz MH; Kapasi S; Wiggins GA; Bhattacharya J
    Neuroimage; 2010 Mar; 50(1):302-13. PubMed ID: 20005297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How children use examples to make conditional predictions.
    Kalish CW
    Cognition; 2010 Jul; 116(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 20362979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interference between cues of the same outcome in a non-causally framed scenario.
    Luque D; Morís J; Cobos PL; López FJ
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):328-32. PubMed ID: 19070656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The smart potential behind probability matching.
    Gaissmaier W; Schooler LJ
    Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):416-22. PubMed ID: 19019351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants.
    Denison S; Xu F
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):335-47. PubMed ID: 24384147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the provenance of judgments of conditional probability.
    Zhao J; Shah A; Osherson D
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 19665110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Slip Induction Task: creating a window into cognitive control failures.
    Clark AJ; Parakh R; Smilek D; Roy EA
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):558-74. PubMed ID: 21994182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of numerical distance and stimulus probability on ERP components elicited by numerical incongruencies in mental addition.
    Szucs D; Csépe V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 15653300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the chances of success: naïve statistics versus kind experience.
    Hogarth RM; Mukherjee K; Soyer E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):14-32. PubMed ID: 22686845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re-evaluating dissociations between implicit and explicit category learning: an event-related fMRI study.
    Gureckis TM; James TW; Nosofsky RM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1697-709. PubMed ID: 20684660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes?
    Höfel L; Jacobsen T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jul; 65(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 17400317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rethinking neural efficiency: effects of controlling for strategy use.
    Toffanin P; Johnson A; de Jong R; Martens S
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 121(5):854-70. PubMed ID: 17907818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing distances in mental images constructed from visual experience or verbal descriptions: the impact of survey versus route perspective.
    Péruch P; Chabanne V; Nesa MP; Thinus-Blanc C; Denis M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1950-67. PubMed ID: 16987783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Associative learning, acquired equivalence, and flexible generalization of knowledge in mild Alzheimer disease.
    Bódi N; Csibri E; Myers CE; Gluck MA; Kéri S
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2009 Jun; 22(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 19506424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the neural basis of uncertainty in perceptual category learning through varying levels of distortion.
    Daniel R; Wagner G; Koch K; Reichenbach JR; Sauer H; Schlösser RG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jul; 23(7):1781-93. PubMed ID: 20617884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional set shifting in autism spectrum disorder: differentiating between the role of perseveration, learned irrelevance, and novelty processing.
    Maes JH; Eling PA; Wezenberg E; Vissers CT; Kan CC
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Feb; 33(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 20694871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The negated conditional: a litmus test for the suppositional conditional?
    Handley SJ; Evans JS; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):559-69. PubMed ID: 16719666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting to know your neighbors: unsupervised learning of topography from real-world, event-based input.
    Boerlin M; Delbruck T; Eng K
    Neural Comput; 2009 Jan; 21(1):216-38. PubMed ID: 19431283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to imitate novel motion sequences.
    Agam Y; Galperin H; Gold BJ; Sekuler R
    J Vis; 2007 Mar; 7(5):1.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.