These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22717911)
1. Standards and practices for bite mark photography. Golden GS J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2011 Dec; 29(2):29-37. PubMed ID: 22717911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of full spectrum digital photography for evidence collection and preservation in cases involving forensic odontology. Wright FD; Golden GS Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):59-67. PubMed ID: 20447784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital analysis of bite marks and human identification. Bowers CM; Johansen RJ Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):327-42, ix. PubMed ID: 11370458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 2: A case study. Wright FD J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 9670513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forensic photography. Ultraviolet imaging of wounds on skin. Barsley RE; West MH; Fair JA Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 1990 Dec; 11(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 2275466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis of bite marks]. Spiessens M; Van der Velden B; Willems G Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 16370436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 1. Wright FD J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):877-80. PubMed ID: 9670512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forensic dentistry and human bite marks: issues for doctors. Pretty IA; Hall RC Hosp Med; 2002 Aug; 63(8):476-82. PubMed ID: 12212419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photographic evidence protocol: the use of digital imaging methods to rectify angular distortion and create life size reproductions of bite mark evidence. Bowers CM; Johansen RJ J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 12064648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology. van der Velden A; Spiessens M; Willems G J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16783951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods]. Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experimental study of bite mark injuries by digital analysis. Santoro V; Lozito P; De Donno A; Introna F J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 20681963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a methodology for the standardisation and improvement of 'Smartphone' photography of patterned bruises and other cutaneous injuries. Biggs PR; Evans ST; Jones MD; Theobald PS Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 23937947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]