These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22717952)

  • 1. Does the quality of dental images depend on patient's age and sex ?- Explanations from the forensic sciences.
    Gelbrich B; Gelbrich G; Lessig R
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 22717952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vitro comparison of subjective image quality of panoramic views acquired via 2D or 3D imaging.
    Pittayapat P; Galiti D; Huang Y; Dreesen K; Schreurs M; Souza PC; Rubira-Bullen IR; Westphalen FH; Pauwels R; Kalema G; Willems G; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):293-300. PubMed ID: 22382448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of the XR-15 portable x-ray unit for forensic odontology.
    Varghese S; Kimmel A; Radmer T; Bradley TG; Bahcall J
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2004 Jun; 22(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 16223025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Usability of dental pulp visibility and tooth coronal index in digital panoramic radiography in age estimation in the forensic medicine.
    Gok E; Fedakar R; Kafa IM
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):381-392. PubMed ID: 31720771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
    Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detectability of normal anatomy in digital panoramic radiographs.
    Gross H; Nilsson M; Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J; 2014; 38(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 25771652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry.
    Güler AU; Sumer M; Sumer P; Biçer I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):741-6. PubMed ID: 16159352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical trial of panoramic dental radiography using a CCD receptor.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):169-71. PubMed ID: 9735461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wound healing of apical tissues after root canal therapy: a long-term clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic observation study.
    Ricucci D; Lin LM; Spångberg LS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):609-21. PubMed ID: 19716731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fraudulent use of radiographic images.
    Bóscolo FN; Almeida SM; Haiter Neto F; Oliveira AE; Tuji FM
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2002 Dec; 20(2):25-30. PubMed ID: 12585670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.
    Dannewitz B; Hassfeld S; Eickholz P; Mühling J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11803389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiography of the periapical region as a diagnostic aid. II. Diagnosis of pulp-related changes.
    Brynolf I
    Dent Radiogr Photogr; 1979; 52(2):25-47. PubMed ID: 287607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of dental and mandibular asymmetries in children according to Levandoski Panoramic Analysis.
    Biagi R; Craparo A; Trovato F; Butti AC; Salvato A
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 13(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 23270287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
    Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic evaluation of third-molar development in a group of Turkish children.
    Uzamiş M; Kansu O; Taner TU; Alpar R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2000; 67(2):136-41, 83. PubMed ID: 10826051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.