These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22717954)

  • 1. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The discrimination potential of radio-opaque composite restorations for identification: part 3.
    Zondag H; Phillips VM
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 22717956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 2.
    Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 22717955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
    Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of amalgam powder and calcium hydroxide to recreate a radiopaque image of a lost dental restoration.
    Shiroma CY
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 12051346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual identification by means of conventional bitewing film and subtraction radiography.
    Andersen L; Wenzel A
    Forensic Sci Int; 1995 Mar; 72(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 7705736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examiner agreement in the replacement decision of Class I amalgam restorations.
    Ermis RB; Aydin U
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 15150636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Point of contact and cervical-proximal margin of occlusal-proximal restorations using amalgam. A clinical evaluation].
    Gaye F; Mbaye M; Kane AW; Diagne A; Diop-Thiaw F; Sarr M
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2000 Jun; 23(90):35-40. PubMed ID: 11372162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The value of examination aids in victim identification: a retrospective study of an airplane crash in Nepal in 2002.
    Bux R; Heidemann D; Enders M; Bratzke H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Dec; 164(2-3):155-8. PubMed ID: 16439083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Principles of dental identification.
    Rothwell BR
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 11370454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overhanging amalgam restorations by undergraduate students.
    Quadir F; Ali Abidi SY; Ahmed S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jul; 24(7):485-8. PubMed ID: 25052971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A radiographic method of estimating surface area of amalgam restorations.
    Sammut E; Deery C; Nugent Z; Ibbetson R
    J Dent; 2006 Nov; 34(10):811-6. PubMed ID: 16687199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of bite-wings for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Rudolphy MP; van Amerongen JP; Penning C; ten Cate JM
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 8402808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dental misidentification on the basis of presumed unique features.
    Kieser JA; Firth NA; Buckley H
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2001 Dec; 19(2):36-9. PubMed ID: 11813499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam tattoo as a means for person identification.
    Slabbert H; Ackermann GL; Altini M
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1991 Jun; 9(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 1814936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations.
    Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic assessments of Class II resin composite restorations in a clinical study: baseline results.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 1583203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endodontic imaging as an aid to forensic personal identification.
    Forrest AS; Wu HY
    Aust Endod J; 2010 Aug; 36(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 20666756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.