These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22718106)

  • 21. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Analysis of hearing threshold shift measured by otoacoustic emissions in soldiers after shooting with use hearing protectors].
    Olszewski J; Miłońiski J; Olszewski S
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 16871954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Verifying the attenuation of earplugs in situ: method validation using artificial head and numerical simulations.
    Bockstael A; de Greve B; Van Renterghem T; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):973-81. PubMed ID: 18681589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Soft tissue conduction as a possible contributor to the limited attenuation provided by hearing protection devices.
    Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H; Kishon-Rabin L
    Noise Health; 2016; 18(84):274-279. PubMed ID: 27762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(26):11-20. PubMed ID: 16053601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methods of measuring and rating hearing protector performance.
    Lotito F
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Oct; 37(10):590-5. PubMed ID: 983949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Polymeric hearing protectors in sport shooting].
    Lwow F; Szmigiero L
    Polim Med; 2007; 37(3):21-9. PubMed ID: 18251202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.
    Murphy WJ; Flamme GA; Campbell AR; Zechmann EL; Tasko SM; Lankford JE; Meinke DK; Finan DS; Stewart M
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S28-S41. PubMed ID: 29299940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wind noise in hearing aids with directional and omnidirectional microphones: Polar characteristics of custom-made hearing aids.
    Chung K; McKibben N; Mongeau L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2529-42. PubMed ID: 20370035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Noise Exposure on a Warship during Firing of a Heavy Machine Gun.
    Paddan GS
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 Nov; 59(9):1208-11. PubMed ID: 26240198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The objective measurement of individual earplug field performance.
    Voix J; Laville F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3722-32. PubMed ID: 19507954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimates of auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. II: Civilian firearms.
    Flamme GA; Wong A; Liebe K; Lynd J
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(45):231-42. PubMed ID: 19805933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):297-311. PubMed ID: 6826899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hearing protection: surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways.
    Berger EH; Kieper RW; Gauger D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):1955-67. PubMed ID: 14587596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hearing protector performance--an update.
    Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 41(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 7405821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of muzzle suppression and ear-level hearing protection in firearm use.
    Branch MP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Jun; 144(6):950-3. PubMed ID: 21493334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.