These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22718168)
41. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of finite element results with photoelastic stress analysis around dental implants with different threads. Geramizadeh M; Katoozian H; Amid R; Kadkhodazadeh M Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 30152630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Canay S; Akça K Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis. Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. Holmgren EP; Seckinger RJ; Kilgren LM; Mante F J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 9835834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis. Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Huang HL; Chen MY; Shen YW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e64-71. PubMed ID: 23527370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Tada S; Stegaroiu R; Kitamura E; Miyakawa O; Kusakari H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):357-68. PubMed ID: 12814310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. 3D finite element analysis of changes in stress levels and distributions for an osseointegrated implant after vertical bone loss. Yoon KH; Kim SG; Lee JH; Suh SW Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 21811169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type. Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Comparative study of stress characteristics in surrounding bone during insertion of dental implants of three different thread designs: A three-dimensional dynamic finite element study. Udomsawat C; Rungsiyakull P; Rungsiyakull C; Khongkhunthian P Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Feb; 5(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 30847230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Different short dental implants on the stress distribution in posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis]. Li X; Staden RV; Hong G Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Nov; 49(11):662-6. PubMed ID: 25622500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Influence of helix angle and density on primary stability of immediately loaded dental implants: three-dimensional finite element analysis]. Ma P; Liu HC; Li DH; Lin S; Shi Z; Peng QJ Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 42(10):618-21. PubMed ID: 18215373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Stress and strain patterns of 1-piece and 2-piece implant systems in bone: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Ormianer Z; Ben Amar A; Duda M; Marku-Cohen S; Lewinstein I Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 22223190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. Rubo JH; Souza EA J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):248-55. PubMed ID: 19170290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effects of different inter-implant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in posterior mandible: a 3D finite element analysis. Simşek B; Erkmen E; Yilmaz D; Eser A Med Eng Phys; 2006 Apr; 28(3):199-213. PubMed ID: 15979921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of fine threads and platform-switching on crestal bone stress around implant-a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Khurana P; Sharma A; Sodhi KK J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 39(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 21905886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]