These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22718168)
61. [Optimized thread pitch design and stress analysis of the cylinder screwed dental implant]. Kong L; Liu BL; Hu KJ; Li DH; Song YL; Ma P; Yang J Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Dec; 24(6):509-12, 515. PubMed ID: 17334071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effects of thread features in osseo-integrated titanium implants using a statistics-based finite element method. Ausiello P; Franciosa P; Martorelli M; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):919-27. PubMed ID: 22595740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Biomechanical comparison of two different collar structured implants supporting 3-unit fixed partial denture: a 3-D FEM study. Meriç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; Ozden AU Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Jan; 70(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 21732740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Load transfer by fine threading the implant neck--a FEM study. Rahimi A; Bourauel C; Jager A; Gedrange T; Heinemann F J Physiol Pharmacol; 2009 Dec; 60 Suppl 8():107-12. PubMed ID: 20400802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Bone stress for a mini-implant close to the roots of adjacent teeth--3D finite element analysis. Motoyoshi M; Ueno S; Okazaki K; Shimizu N Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 19269789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Bone stress analysis of various angulations of mesiodistal implants with splinted crowns in the posterior mandible: a three-dimensional finite element study. Lan TH; Pan CY; Lee HE; Huang HL; Wang CH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):763-70. PubMed ID: 20657872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis. Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Petrie CS; Williams JL Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions. Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):461-72. PubMed ID: 20556244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries. Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. [Three dimensional finite element analysis of biomechanical distribution of dental implants with immediate loading]. Han XL; Liu ZW; Li YT Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 21598477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Li T; Kong L; Wang Y; Hu K; Song L; Liu B; Li D; Shao J; Ding Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 38(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 19656657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Stress patterns on implants in prostheses supported by four or six implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Silva GC; Mendonça JA; Lopes LR; Landre J Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 20369081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Kong L; Gu Z; Li T; Wu J; Hu K; Liu Y; Zhou H; Liu B Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 19918598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effects of cortical bone thickness and implant length on bone strain and interfacial micromotion in an immediately loaded implant. Tu MG; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Huang HL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):706-14. PubMed ID: 20657865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]