204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2271857)
1. Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
Hobbs P; Kay C; Friedman EH; St Leger AS; Lambert C; Boggis CR; Howard TM; Owen AW; Asbury DL
BMJ; 1990 Dec; 301(6764):1314-6. PubMed ID: 2271857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Response of women aged 65-74 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study in London, UK.
Horton Taylor D; McPherson K; Parbhoo S; Perry N
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1996 Feb; 50(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 8762359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening in Italy: 2004 survey and 2005 preliminary data.
Giorgi D; Giordano L; Ventura L; Frigerio A; Paci E; Zappa M
Epidemiol Prev; 2007; 31(2-3 Suppl 2):7-20. PubMed ID: 17824359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening in the county of Fyn. November 1993-December 1999.
Njor SH; Olsen AH; Bellstrøm T; Dyreborg U; Bak M; Axelsson C; Graversen HP; Schwartz W; Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 2003; (110):1-33. PubMed ID: 12739252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect on attendance at breast cancer screening of adding a self administered questionnaire to the usual invitation to breast screening in southern England.
Banks E; Richardson A; Beral V; Crossley B; Simmonds M; Hilton E; English R; Davis J; Austoker J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Feb; 52(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 9578859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?
Giorgi D; Paci E; Zappa M; Rosselli del Turco M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Oct; 48(5):471-5. PubMed ID: 7964357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of invitation schemes on breast cancer screening coverage: A cohort study from Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacobsen KK; von Euler Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Lynge E
J Med Screen; 2017 Mar; 24(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27206815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive and affective correlates of decisional balance regarding screening mammography in older women.
Phillips CA; Green HJ; Morrissey SA
Psychol Health Med; 2012; 17(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 21780961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast cancer screening among relatives of women with breast cancer.
Kaplan KM; Weinberg GB; Small A; Herndon JL
Am J Public Health; 1991 Sep; 81(9):1174-9. PubMed ID: 1951830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?
Fallowfield LJ; Rodway A; Baum M
J R Soc Med; 1990 Sep; 83(9):547-51. PubMed ID: 2213798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect on breast cancer screening response in The Netherlands of inviting women for an additional scientific investigation.
Peeters PH; Beckers CG; Hogervorst JM; Collette HJ
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Apr; 48(2):175-7. PubMed ID: 8189174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Texas Breast Screening Project: Part I. Mammographic and clinical results.
Peters GN; Vogel VG; Evans WP; Bondy M; Halabi S; Lord J; Laville EA
South Med J; 1993 Apr; 86(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 8465213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine invitation of women aged 65-69 for breast cancer screening: results of first year of pilot study.
Rubin G; Garvican L; Moss S
BMJ; 1998 Aug; 317(7155):388-9. PubMed ID: 9694755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing harms and benefits of service mammography screening programs: a cohort study.
Puliti D; Miccinesi G; Zappa M; Manneschi G; Crocetti E; Paci E
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):R9. PubMed ID: 22230345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A mammographic screening pilot project in Victoria 1988-1990. The Essendon Breast X-ray Program Collaborative Group.
Med J Aust; 1992 Nov; 157(10):670-3. PubMed ID: 1435408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.
Hegenscheid K; Hoffmann W; Fochler S; Domin M; Weiss S; Hartmann B; Bick U; Hosten N
Am J Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 41(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 21961470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
