These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22718874)

  • 1. A generic hybrid model for bulk elastodynamics, with application to ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation.
    Rajagopal P; Skelton EA; Choi W; Lowe MJ; Craster RV
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1239-52. PubMed ID: 22718874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Numerical model of longitudinal wave scattering in polycrystals.
    Ghoshal G; Turner JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jul; 56(7):1419-28. PubMed ID: 19574152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generic hybrid model for the simulation of three-dimensional bulk elastodynamics for use in non-destructive evaluation.
    Choi W; Skelton E; Pettit J; Lowe MJ; Craster R
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2016 May; 63(5):726-736. PubMed ID: 26960223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A time-domain finite element boundary integration method for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation.
    Shi F; Choi W; Skelton EA; Lowe MJ; Craster RV
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Dec; 61(12):2054-66. PubMed ID: 25474780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of ultrasonic guided wave mode conversion in a plate with thickness variation.
    Cho Y
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(3):591-603. PubMed ID: 18238586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical time-domain modeling of linear and nonlinear ultrasonic wave propagation using finite integration techniques--theory and applications.
    Schubert F
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):221-9. PubMed ID: 15047289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Numerical simulation and visualization of elastic waves using mass-spring lattice model.
    Yim H; Sohn Y
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(3):549-58. PubMed ID: 18238581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study of analytical and numerical transient force excitations on an elastic half-space.
    Ludwig R; Moore D; Lord W
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1989; 36(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 18284989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved detection of rough defects for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation inspections based on finite element modeling of elastic wave scattering.
    Pettit JR; Walker AE; Lowe MJ
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Oct; 62(10):1797-808. PubMed ID: 26470042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diffuse ultrasonic backscatter at normal incidence through a curved interface.
    Ghoshal G; Turner JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3449-58. PubMed ID: 21218878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
    Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A system model for ultrasonic NDT based on the Physical Theory of Diffraction (PTD).
    Darmon M; Dorval V; Kamta Djakou A; Fradkin L; Chatillon S
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Jan; 64():115-27. PubMed ID: 26323548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasonic field profile evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous anisotropic materials using 2D ray tracing model: Numerical and experimental comparison.
    Kolkoori SR; Rahman MU; Chinta PK; Ktreutzbruck M; Rethmeier M; Prager J
    Ultrasonics; 2013 Feb; 53(2):396-411. PubMed ID: 22963829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wigner distribution of a transducer beam pattern within a multiple scattering formalism for heterogeneous solids.
    Ghoshal G; Turner JA; Weaver RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2009-21. PubMed ID: 17902838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A nodal discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear elastic wave propagation.
    Bou Matar O; Guerder PY; Li Y; Vandewoestyne B; Van Den Abeele K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):3650-63. PubMed ID: 22559342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probabilistic approaches to compute uncertainty intervals and sensitivity factors of ultrasonic simulations of a weld inspection.
    Rupin F; Blatman G; Lacaze S; Fouquet T; Chassignole B
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Apr; 54(4):1037-46. PubMed ID: 24434115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of an ultrasonic inspection robot using an electromagnetic acoustic transducer for a Lamb wave and an SH-plate wave.
    Murayama R; Makiyama S; Kodama M; Taniguchi Y
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):825-9. PubMed ID: 15047391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical methods for modeling of ultrasonic nondestructive testing of anisotropic media.
    Spies M
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):213-9. PubMed ID: 15047288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex hybrid models combining deterministic and machine learning components for numerical climate modeling and weather prediction.
    Krasnopolsky VM; Fox-Rabinovitz MS
    Neural Netw; 2006 Mar; 19(2):122-34. PubMed ID: 16527454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element modeling of grain size effects on the ultrasonic microstructural noise backscattering in polycrystalline materials.
    Bai X; Tie B; Schmitt JH; Aubry D
    Ultrasonics; 2018 Jul; 87():182-202. PubMed ID: 29547790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.