These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22718938)
1. Evolution of testing algorithms at a university hospital for detection of Clostridium difficile infections. Culbreath K; Ager E; Nemeyer RJ; Kerr A; Gilligan PH J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Sep; 50(9):3073-6. PubMed ID: 22718938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection. Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventable Patient Harm: a Multidisciplinary, Bundled Approach to Reducing Clostridium difficile Infections While Using a Glutamate Dehydrogenase/Toxin Immunochromatographic Assay/Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Diagnostic Algorithm. Schultz K; Sickbert-Bennett E; Marx A; Weber DJ; DiBiase LM; Campbell-Bright S; Bode LE; Baker M; Belhorn T; Buchanan M; Goldbach S; Harden J; Hoke E; Huenniger B; Juliano JJ; Langston M; Ritchie H; Rutala WA; Smith J; Summerlin-Long S; Teal L; Gilligan P J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 56(9):. PubMed ID: 29997201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms. Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology. Sandlund J; Bartolome A; Almazan A; Tam S; Biscocho S; Abusali S; Bishop JJ; Nolan N; Estis J; Todd J; Young S; Senchyna F; Banaei N J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 30158195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile. Fenner L; Widmer AF; Goy G; Rudin S; Frei R J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):328-30. PubMed ID: 18032627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Immunoassay in Stool Testing of Patients with Suspected Krutova M; Briksi A; Tkadlec J; Zajac M; Matejkova J; Nyc O; Drevinek P J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 31391230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of a polymerase chain reaction method in the detection of Clostridioides difficile. Jaqueti Aroca J; Molina Esteban LM; García-Arata I; García-Martínez J; Cano De Torres I; Prieto Menchero S Rev Esp Quimioter; 2021 Apr; 34(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 33601876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reevaluation of the Premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures. Doing KM; Hintz MS; Keefe C; Horne S; LeVasseur S; Kulikowski ML Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 66(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 20117349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B. Savolainen R; Koskinen JM; Mentula S; Koskinen JO; Kaukoranta SS J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31941691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous Detection of Yoo IY; Song DJ; Huh HJ; Lee NY Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):214-217. PubMed ID: 30430786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease. Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeting the tcdA gene: is this appropriate for detection of A and/or B Clostridium difficile toxin-producing strains? Kozak K; Elagin V; Norén T; Unemo M J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jun; 49(6):2383; author reply 2383-4. PubMed ID: 21617002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection. Kim H; Kim WH; Kim M; Jeong SH; Lee K Ann Lab Med; 2014 May; 34(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 24790912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay. Ohshima T; Osaki T; Yamamoto Y; Asai S; Miyachi H; Kamiya S J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 30232129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan. Chang FC; Liu CP; Sun FJ; Lin CC J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2021 Apr; 54(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 31624018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost of illness comparison for toxigenic Clostridioides difficile diagnosis algorithms in developing countries. Cançado GGL; Abreu ES; Nardelli MJ; Serwa P; Brachmann M Anaerobe; 2021 Aug; 70():102390. PubMed ID: 34058377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]