254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22718938)
1. Evolution of testing algorithms at a university hospital for detection of Clostridium difficile infections.
Culbreath K; Ager E; Nemeyer RJ; Kerr A; Gilligan PH
J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Sep; 50(9):3073-6. PubMed ID: 22718938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of BD GeneOhm Cdiff real-time PCR assay with a two-step algorithm and a toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of toxigenic Clostridium difficile infection.
Kvach EJ; Ferguson D; Riska PF; Landry ML
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 19864479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preventable Patient Harm: a Multidisciplinary, Bundled Approach to Reducing Clostridium difficile Infections While Using a Glutamate Dehydrogenase/Toxin Immunochromatographic Assay/Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Diagnostic Algorithm.
Schultz K; Sickbert-Bennett E; Marx A; Weber DJ; DiBiase LM; Campbell-Bright S; Bode LE; Baker M; Belhorn T; Buchanan M; Goldbach S; Harden J; Hoke E; Huenniger B; Juliano JJ; Langston M; Ritchie H; Rutala WA; Smith J; Summerlin-Long S; Teal L; Gilligan P
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 56(9):. PubMed ID: 29997201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clostridium difficile testing in the clinical laboratory by use of multiple testing algorithms.
Novak-Weekley SM; Marlowe EM; Miller JM; Cumpio J; Nomura JH; Vance PH; Weissfeld A
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Mar; 48(3):889-93. PubMed ID: 20071552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridioides difficile Toxins A and B by Use of Automated Single-Molecule Counting Technology.
Sandlund J; Bartolome A; Almazan A; Tam S; Biscocho S; Abusali S; Bishop JJ; Nolan N; Estis J; Todd J; Young S; Senchyna F; Banaei N
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Nov; 56(11):. PubMed ID: 30158195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detection of Clostridium difficile.
Fenner L; Widmer AF; Goy G; Rudin S; Frei R
J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):328-30. PubMed ID: 18032627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Immunoassay in Stool Testing of Patients with Suspected
Krutova M; Briksi A; Tkadlec J; Zajac M; Matejkova J; Nyc O; Drevinek P
J Clin Microbiol; 2019 Oct; 57(10):. PubMed ID: 31391230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of tcdB real-time PCR in a three-step diagnostic algorithm for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
Larson AM; Fung AM; Fang FC
J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19923482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of a polymerase chain reaction method in the detection of Clostridioides difficile.
Jaqueti Aroca J; Molina Esteban LM; García-Arata I; García-Martínez J; Cano De Torres I; Prieto Menchero S
Rev Esp Quimioter; 2021 Apr; 34(2):141-144. PubMed ID: 33601876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reevaluation of the Premier Clostridium difficile toxin A and B immunoassay with comparison to glutamate dehydrogenase common antigen testing evaluating Bartels cytotoxin and Prodesse ProGastro Cd polymerase chain reaction as confirmatory procedures.
Doing KM; Hintz MS; Keefe C; Horne S; LeVasseur S; Kulikowski ML
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Feb; 66(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 20117349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease: examination of multiple algorithms using toxin EIA, glutamate dehydrogenase EIA and loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
Bamber AI; Fitzsimmons K; Cunniffe JG; Beasor CC; Mackintosh CA; Hobbs G
Br J Biomed Sci; 2012; 69(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 23057158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.
Savolainen R; Koskinen JM; Mentula S; Koskinen JO; Kaukoranta SS
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(4):. PubMed ID: 31941691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous Detection of
Yoo IY; Song DJ; Huh HJ; Lee NY
Ann Lab Med; 2019 Mar; 39(2):214-217. PubMed ID: 30430786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Simplexa universal direct PCR with cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: performance, cost, and correlation with disease.
Landry ML; Ferguson D; Topal J
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jan; 52(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 24226924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeting the tcdA gene: is this appropriate for detection of A and/or B Clostridium difficile toxin-producing strains?
Kozak K; Elagin V; Norén T; Unemo M
J Clin Microbiol; 2011 Jun; 49(6):2383; author reply 2383-4. PubMed ID: 21617002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.
Kim H; Kim WH; Kim M; Jeong SH; Lee K
Ann Lab Med; 2014 May; 34(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 24790912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection Based on Immunochromatography Testing and Toxigenic Culture Assay.
Ohshima T; Osaki T; Yamamoto Y; Asai S; Miyachi H; Kamiya S
J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 56(12):. PubMed ID: 30232129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing laboratory workflow for the diagnosis of Clostridiodes difficile infection in a medical center in Northern Taiwan.
Chang FC; Liu CP; Sun FJ; Lin CC
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2021 Apr; 54(2):284-289. PubMed ID: 31624018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost of illness comparison for toxigenic Clostridioides difficile diagnosis algorithms in developing countries.
Cançado GGL; Abreu ES; Nardelli MJ; Serwa P; Brachmann M
Anaerobe; 2021 Aug; 70():102390. PubMed ID: 34058377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of
Senok AC; Aldosari KM; Alowaisheq RA; Abid OA; Alsuhaibani KA; Khan MA; Somily AM
Saudi J Gastroenterol; 2017; 23(4):259-262. PubMed ID: 28721981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
