262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22720835)
1. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22720835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals.
Zhang J; Han L; Shields L; Tian J; Wang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(49):e18099. PubMed ID: 31804319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in "evidence-based" Chinese journals.
Li JL; Ge L; Ma JC; Zeng QL; Yao L; An N; Ding JX; Gan YH; Tian JH
Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():58. PubMed ID: 24906805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.
Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.
Pastorino R; Milovanovic S; Stojanovic J; Efremov L; Amore R; Boccia S
PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154217. PubMed ID: 27167982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reporting completeness of scoping reviews in orthodontic literature up to 2022. An empirical study.
Mikelis F; Koletsi D
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 45(4):444-449. PubMed ID: 37183724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Papageorgiou SN; Papadopoulos MA; Athanasiou AE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Aug; 14(3):116-37. PubMed ID: 21771267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study.
Steegmans PAJ; Bipat S; Meursinge Reynders RA
Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 8(1):89. PubMed ID: 30953538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.
Wasiak J; Tyack Z; Ware R; Goodwin N; Faggion CM
Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):754-763. PubMed ID: 27990772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
