These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22720884)

  • 1. Comparison of the glidescope, CMAC, storz DCI with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated difficult laryngoscopy: a manikin study.
    Healy DW; Picton P; Morris M; Turner C
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2012 Jun; 12():11. PubMed ID: 22720884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury--a manikin study.
    Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 24998112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
    van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.
    Rajagopal S; Gardner RN; Swanson E; Kim S; Sondekoppam R; Ueda K; Hanada S
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50523. PubMed ID: 38222170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective model-based comparison of different laryngoscopes for difficult intubation in infants.
    Kalbhenn J; Boelke AK; Steinmann D
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Aug; 22(8):776-80. PubMed ID: 22646973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the conventional CMAC and the D-blade CMAC with the direct laryngoscopes in simulated cervical spine injury-a manikin study].
    Jain D; Dhankar M; Wig J; Jain A
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2014; 64(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 25096773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
    Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the first-attempt tracheal intubation success of the hyperangulated McGrath® X-blade vs the Macintosh-type CMAC videolaryngoscope in patients with cervical immobilization: a two-centre randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang J; Tan LZ; Toh H; Foo CW; Wijeratne S; Hu H; Seet E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Aug; 36(4):1139-1145. PubMed ID: 34347225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Endotracheal intubation comparing a prototype Storz CMAC and a glidescope videolaryngoscope in a medical transport helicopter - a pilot study.
    Boedeker BH; Berg BW; Bernhagen MA; Murray WB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():37-9. PubMed ID: 19377109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope size 2 Macintosh blade with size 2 C-MAC D-Blade for laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in children with simulated cervical spine injury: A prospective randomized crossover study.
    Sinha R; Ray BR; Sharma A; Pandey RK; Punj J; Darlong V; Trikha A
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2019; 35(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 31920236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation by Inexperienced Users: A Pediatric Manikin Study.
    Balaban O; Hakim M; Walia H; Tumin D; Lind M; Tobias JD
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2020 Apr; 36(4):169-172. PubMed ID: 28590998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indirect videolaryngoscopy with C-MAC D-Blade and GlideScope: a randomized, controlled comparison in patients with suspected difficult airways.
    Serocki G; Neumann T; Scharf E; Dörges V; Cavus E
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Feb; 79(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 23032922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endotracheal intubation in a medical transport helicopter - comparing direct laryngoscopy with the prototype Storz CMAC videolaryngoscope in a simulated difficult intubating position.
    Boedeker BH; Berg BW; Bernhagen M; Murray WB
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():40-2. PubMed ID: 19377110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins.
    Eismann H; Sieg L; Etti N; Friedrich L; Schröter C; Mommsen P; Krettek C; Zeckey C
    Eur J Med Res; 2017 Aug; 22(1):27. PubMed ID: 28797305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A mannequin study of intubation with the AP advance and GlideScope Ranger videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Hodd JA; Doyle DJ; Gupta S; Dalton JE; Cata JP; Brewer EJ; James M; Sessler DI
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Oct; 113(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 21890882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficacy of the Storz Miller 1 video laryngoscope in a simulated infant difficult intubation.
    Fiadjoe JE; Stricker PA; Hackell RS; Salam A; Gurnaney H; Rehman MA; Litman RS
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1783-6. PubMed ID: 19448202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of intubation conditions with CMAC Miller videolaryngoscope and conventional Miller laryngoscope in lateral position in infants: A prospective randomized trial.
    Jain D; Mehta S; Gandhi K; Arora S; Parikh B; Abas M
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 28(3):226-230. PubMed ID: 29316004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of five video laryngoscopes and conventional direct laryngoscopy : Investigations on simple and simulated difficult airways on the intubation trainer].
    Ruetzler K; Imach S; Weiss M; Haas T; Schmidt AR
    Anaesthesist; 2015 Jul; 64(7):513-9. PubMed ID: 26174747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the C-MAC D-Blade, Conventional C-MAC, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes in Simulated Easy and Difficult Airways.
    Kılıçaslan A; Topal A; Erol A; Uzun ST
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2014 Aug; 42(4):182-9. PubMed ID: 27366418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized control led study comparing CMAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for insertion of double lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy.
    Mathew A; Chandy J; Punnoose J; Gnanamuthu BR; Jeyseelan L; Sahajanandan R
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):266-271. PubMed ID: 34349378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.