These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22721175)

  • 1. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking.
    Morton G; Schuster A; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 22721175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength.
    Schuster A; Morton G; Hussain ST; Jogiya R; Kutty S; Asrress KN; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Perera D; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 23246014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of global and segmental myocardial strain using cine DENSE at 3 T: a multicenter cardiovascular magnetic resonance study in healthy subjects and patients with heart disease.
    Auger DA; Ghadimi S; Cai X; Reagan CE; Sun C; Abdi M; Cao JJ; Cheng JY; Ngai N; Scott AD; Ferreira PF; Oshinski JN; Emamifar N; Ennis DB; Loecher M; Liu ZQ; Croisille P; Viallon M; Bilchick KC; Epstein FH
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2022 Apr; 24(1):23. PubMed ID: 35369885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of Biventricular Myocardial Strain Using CMR Feature Tracking: Reproducibility in Small Animals.
    Li H; Qu Y; Metze P; Sommerfeld F; Just S; Abaei A; Rasche V
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():8492705. PubMed ID: 33553431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of both DENSE and feature tracking techniques with tagging for the cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of myocardial strain.
    Cao JJ; Ngai N; Duncanson L; Cheng J; Gliganic K; Chen Q
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Apr; 20(1):26. PubMed ID: 29669563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest reliability of left and right ventricular systolic function by new and conventional echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance parameters.
    Houard L; Militaru S; Tanaka K; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Pouleur AC; Gerber BL
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Sep; 22(10):1157-1167. PubMed ID: 32793957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of global and regional magnetic resonance feature tracking derived strain parameters of the left and right ventricle.
    Schmidt B; Dick A; Treutlein M; Schiller P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baeßler B
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():97-105. PubMed ID: 28267556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced myocardial characterization in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: feasibility of CMR-based feature tracking strain analysis in a case-control study.
    Yang L; Zhang L; Cao S; Gao C; Xu H; Song T; Zhang X; Wang K
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6118-6128. PubMed ID: 32588208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global and regional left ventricular myocardial deformation measures by magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy volunteers: comparison with tagging and relevance of gender.
    Augustine D; Lewandowski AJ; Lazdam M; Rai A; Francis J; Myerson S; Noble A; Becher H; Neubauer S; Petersen SE; Leeson P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 Jan; 15(1):8. PubMed ID: 23331550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment comparing the reproducibility of four commercially available CMR-feature tracking algorithms.
    Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5137-5147. PubMed ID: 29872912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting.
    Morais P; Marchi A; Bogaert JA; Dresselaers T; Heyde B; D'hooge J; Bogaert J
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2017 Feb; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 28209163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scan-rescan reproducibility of ventricular and atrial MRI feature tracking strain.
    Lamy J; Soulat G; Evin M; Huber A; de Cesare A; Giron A; Diebold B; Redheuil A; Mousseaux E; Kachenoura N
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jan; 92():197-203. PubMed ID: 29227821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of myocardial strain in patients with isolated left ventricular non-compaction and healthy subjects using deformable registration algorithm: comparison with feature tracking.
    Liu J; Li Y; Cui Y; Cao Y; Yao S; Zhou X; Wetzl J; Zeng W; Shi H
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 Sep; 20(1):400. PubMed ID: 32883201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress.
    Schuster A; Kutty S; Padiyath A; Parish V; Gribben P; Danford DA; Makowski MR; Bigalke B; Beerbaum P; Nagel E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Oct; 13(1):58. PubMed ID: 21992220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of feature tracking, fast-SENC, and myocardial tagging for global and segmental left ventricular strain.
    Bucius P; Erley J; Tanacli R; Zieschang V; Giusca S; Korosoglou G; Steen H; Stehning C; Pieske B; Pieske-Kraigher E; Schuster A; Lapinskas T; Kelle S
    ESC Heart Fail; 2020 Apr; 7(2):523-532. PubMed ID: 31800152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of biventricular myocardial function using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking, endocardial border delineation and echocardiographic speckle tracking in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and healthy controls.
    Kempny A; Fernández-Jiménez R; Orwat S; Schuler P; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baumgartner H; Diller GP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 May; 14(1):32. PubMed ID: 22650308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inter-vendor reproducibility and accuracy of segmental left ventricular strain measurements using CMR feature tracking.
    Dobrovie M; Barreiro-Pérez M; Curione D; Symons R; Claus P; Voigt JU; Bogaert J
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6846-6857. PubMed ID: 31297633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Left ventricular global myocardial strain assessment: Are CMR feature-tracking algorithms useful in the clinical setting?
    Pierpaolo P; Rolf S; Manuel BP; Davide C; Dresselaers T; Claus P; Bogaert J
    Radiol Med; 2020 May; 125(5):444-450. PubMed ID: 32125636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking: Impact of training on observer performance and reproducibility.
    Backhaus SJ; Metschies G; Billing M; Kowallick JT; Gertz RJ; Lapinskas T; Pieske B; Lotz J; Bigalke B; Kutty S; Hasenfuß G; Beerbaum P; Kelle S; Schuster A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210127. PubMed ID: 30682045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging.
    Donekal S; Ambale-Venkatesh B; Berkowitz S; Wu CO; Choi EY; Fernandes V; Yan R; Harouni AA; Bluemke DA; Lima JA
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2013 May; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 23663535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.