132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272136)
1. A comparison of heparinized low osmolality ionic and nonionic contrast media in 500 patients undergoing cardiac angiography.
Feldman RL
Clin Cardiol; 1990 Nov; 13(11):794-6. PubMed ID: 2272136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography.
Wisneski JA; Gertz EW; Dahlgren M; Muslin A
Am J Cardiol; 1989 Feb; 63(7):489-95. PubMed ID: 2916435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial comparing the impact of a nonionic (Iomeprol) versus an ionic (Ioxaglate) low osmolar contrast medium on abrupt vessel closure and ischemic complications after coronary angioplasty.
Schräder R; Esch I; Ensslen R; Fach WA; Merle H; Scherer D; Sievert H; Spies HF; Zeplin HE
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):395-402. PubMed ID: 9973019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of low-osmolality contrast media in thromboembolic complications: scanning electron microscopy study.
Casalini E
Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):741-4. PubMed ID: 1584930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low osmolar contrast media in relation to thrombotic complications of angioplasty in patients with unstable angina.
Malekianpour M; Bonan R; Lespérance J; Gosselin G; Hudon G; Doucet S; Laurier J; Duval D
Am Heart J; 1998 Jun; 135(6 Pt 1):1067-75. PubMed ID: 9630113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy.
Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three new low-osmolality contrast agents: a comparative study of patient discomfort.
Smith DC; Yahiku PY; Maloney MD; Hart KL
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1988; 9(1):137-9. PubMed ID: 3124566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk of thromboembolism during diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures with nonionic contrast media.
Hwang MH; Piao ZE; Murdock DK; Messmore HL; Giardina JJ; Scanlon PJ
Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 2296654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of an ionic versus a nonionic low osmolar contrast agent on the thrombotic complications of coronary angioplasty.
Piessens JH; Stammen F; Vrolix MC; Glazier JJ; Benit E; De Geest H; Willems JL
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1993 Feb; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 8448808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Miller R; Knudtson M; Robb J; Dragatakis L; Browne KF; Vetrovec G; Smith SC
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 19(5):899-906. PubMed ID: 1552109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using Hexabrix or Renografin in high-risk patients.
Feldman RL; Jalowiec DA; Hill JA; Lambert CR
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Jun; 61(15):1334-7. PubMed ID: 3287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Allergic-type adverse reactions to low osmolality contrast media in patients with a history of allergy or asthma.
Simon MR
Invest Radiol; 1995 May; 30(5):285-90. PubMed ID: 7558732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of clot formation with ionic and nonionic contrast media in cerebral angiography. Tama Contrast Media Study Group.
Sato E; Saito I
Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):925-8. PubMed ID: 8959182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ionic and nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary arteriography. A crossover study in children.
Saito H; Kimura K; Takamiya M; Yamamoto K; Ohta M; Yamagami H; Kamiya T
Invest Radiol; 1988 Dec; 23(12):910-3. PubMed ID: 3203992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.
Esplugas E; Cequier A; Gomez-Hospital JA; Del Blanco BG; Jara F
Drug Saf; 2002; 25(15):1079-98. PubMed ID: 12452733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media.
Esplugas E; Cequier A; Jara F; Mauri J; Soler T; Sala J; Sabate X
Am J Cardiol; 1991 Oct; 68(10):1020-4. PubMed ID: 1927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Early hemodynamic reactions of an ionic low osmolar and a nonionic contrast medium].
Wink K; Heinrich R
Z Kardiol; 1984 Oct; 73(10):628-33. PubMed ID: 6516515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. TAT, F1 + 2, and D-dimer levels in patients after coronary angiography with nonionic or ionic contrast media or after cardiac catheterization.
Biancardi M; Cimminiello C; Toschi V; Schiavina G; Regalia F; Casolo F; Bonfardeci G
Semin Thromb Hemost; 1996; 22 Suppl 1():61-5. PubMed ID: 8807731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized prospective trial of ioxaglate 320 (Hexabrix) vs. iodixanol 320 (Visipaque) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Sutton AG; Ashton VJ; Campbell PG; Price DJ; Hall JA; de Belder MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2002 Nov; 57(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 12410513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ionic low-osmolar versus nonionic iso-osmolar contrast media to obviate worsening nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients: the ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) study.
Mehran R; Nikolsky E; Kirtane AJ; Caixeta A; Wong SC; Teirstein PS; Downey WE; Batchelor WB; Casterella PJ; Kim YH; Fahy M; Dangas GD
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 May; 2(5):415-21. PubMed ID: 19463464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
