229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22722355)
1. Examining the diagnostic justification abilities of fourth-year medical students.
Williams RG; Klamen DL
Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1008-14. PubMed ID: 22722355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations in senior medical student diagnostic justification ability.
Williams RG; Klamen DL; Markwell SJ; Cianciolo AT; Colliver JA; Verhulst SJ
Acad Med; 2014 May; 89(5):790-8. PubMed ID: 24667511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A hypothesis-driven physical examination learning and assessment procedure for medical students: initial validity evidence.
Yudkowsky R; Otaki J; Lowenstein T; Riddle J; Nishigori H; Bordage G
Med Educ; 2009 Aug; 43(8):729-40. PubMed ID: 19659486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sharpening the eye of the OSCE with critical action analysis.
Payne NJ; Bradley EB; Heald EB; Maughan KL; Michaelsen VE; Wang XQ; Corbett EC
Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):900-5. PubMed ID: 18820517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity evidence for a patient note scoring rubric based on the new patient note format of the United States Medical Licensing Examination.
Park YS; Lineberry M; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Riddle J; Yudkowsky R
Acad Med; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1552-7. PubMed ID: 23969362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Objective Structured Clinical Examinations Score Reflect the Clinical Reasoning Ability of Medical Students?
Park WB; Kang SH; Lee YS; Myung SJ
Am J Med Sci; 2015 Jul; 350(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 25647834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential diagnosis in a 3-station acute abdominal pain objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): a needs assessment in third-year medical student performance and summative evaluation in the surgical clerkship.
Falcone JL; Watson GA
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):266-9. PubMed ID: 21708362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How do gender and anxiety affect students' self-assessment and actual performance on a high-stakes clinical skills examination?
Colbert-Getz JM; Fleishman C; Jung J; Shilkofski N
Acad Med; 2013 Jan; 88(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 23165273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Student performance problems in medical school clinical skills assessments.
Hauer KE; Teherani A; Kerr KM; O'Sullivan PS; Irby DM
Acad Med; 2007 Oct; 82(10 Suppl):S69-72. PubMed ID: 17895695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel 3-year longitudinal pilot study of medical students' acquisition and retention of screening eye examination skills.
Lippa LM; Boker J; Duke A; Amin A
Ophthalmology; 2006 Jan; 113(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 16310854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical skills-related learning goals of senior medical students after performance feedback.
Chang A; Chou CL; Teherani A; Hauer KE
Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):878-85. PubMed ID: 21848715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A model for integrated assessment of clinical competence.
Panzarella KJ; Manyon AT
J Allied Health; 2007; 36(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 17941410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing students' ability to detect melanomas using standardized patients and moulage.
Hernandez C; Mermelstein R; Robinson JK; Yudkowsky R
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2013 Mar; 68(3):e83-8. PubMed ID: 22196980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Checklist content on a standardized patient assessment: an ex post facto review.
Boulet JR; van Zanten M; de Champlain A; Hawkins RE; Peitzman SJ
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 16871427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-rater reliability and generalizability of patient note scores using a scoring rubric based on the USMLE Step-2 CS format.
Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Xing K; Yudkowsky R
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2016 Oct; 21(4):761-73. PubMed ID: 26757931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characteristics and Implications of Diagnostic Justification Scores Based on the New Patient Note Format of the USMLE Step 2 CS Exam.
Yudkowsky R; Park YS; Hyderi A; Bordage G
Acad Med; 2015 Nov; 90(11 Suppl):S56-62. PubMed ID: 26505103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prior experiences associated with residents' scores on a communication and interpersonal skill OSCE.
Yudkowsky R; Downing SM; Ommert D
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Sep; 62(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 16603331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential Weighting for Subcomponent Measures of Integrated Clinical Encounter Scores Based on the USMLE Step 2 CS Examination: Effects on Composite Score Reliability and Pass-Fail Decisions.
Park YS; Lineberry M; Hyderi A; Bordage G; Xing K; Yudkowsky R
Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11 Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S24-S30. PubMed ID: 27779506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
