These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22722415)

  • 21. Clinical study of indirect composite resin inlays in posterior stress-bearing cavities placed by dental students: results after 4 years.
    Huth KC; Chen HY; Mehl A; Hickel R; Manhart J
    J Dent; 2011 Jul; 39(7):478-88. PubMed ID: 21554920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.
    Demarco FF; Corrêa MB; Cenci MS; Moraes RR; Opdam NJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 22192253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
    Can Say E; Kayahan B; Ozel E; Gokce K; Soyman M; Bayirli G
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 16685291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.
    Beier US; Kapferer I; Burtscher D; Giesinger JM; Dumfahrt H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 22720292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The prevalence of postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with Class II composite resin restorations.
    Borgmeijer PJ; Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 1939803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of microhybrid, packable and nanofilled resin composites in Class I restorations.
    Sadeghi M; Lynch CD; Shahamat N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 20202097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: five-year results.
    Rasmusson CG; Lundin SA
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(5):173-82. PubMed ID: 8614898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical performance of direct versus indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth: A systematic review.
    Azeem RA; Sureshbabu NM
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 29628639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The One-Year In Vivo Comparison of Lithium Disilicate and Zirconium Dioxide Inlays.
    Behera R; Mishra L; Divakar DD; Al-Kheraif AA; Singh NR; Lukomska-Szymanska M
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jun; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 34198824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture Resistance of Ceramic Crowns Supported with Indirect Chair-side Composite Cores.
    Abdelaziz KM; Keshk CK; Alshadidi A; Mafraq S; Murchison DF
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2018; 8(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 29629327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bonding values of two contemporary ceramic inlay materials to dentin following simulated aging.
    Khalil AA; Abdelaziz KM
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 7(6):446-53. PubMed ID: 26816574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review.
    Hopp CD; Land MF
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2013; 5():21-32. PubMed ID: 23750101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Which filling material is best in the primary dentition?
    Uribe S
    Evid Based Dent; 2010; 11(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 20348886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition.
    Manhart J; Chen H; Hamm G; Hickel R
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):481-508. PubMed ID: 15470871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ceramic materials have similar short term survival rates to other materials on posterior teeth.
    Critchlow S
    Evid Based Dent; 2012 Jun; 13(2):49. PubMed ID: 22722415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A 3-year follow-up study of preformed beta-quartz glass-ceramic insert restorations.
    Sjögren G; Hedlund SO; Jonsson C; Sandström A
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11203902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.