BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22722526)

  • 1. The development and acceptance of a simple tool to aid IRB compliance.
    Vulcano DM
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2012; 21(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 22722526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Bramstedt KA; Kassimatis K
    Clin Invest Med; 2004 Dec; 27(6):316-23. PubMed ID: 15675112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.
    Ernst AA; Fish S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ins and outs of independent IRBs.
    Lis JM; Murray MG
    J Health Life Sci Law; 2008 Oct; 2(1):73, 75-122. PubMed ID: 19004298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frustrations in benchmarking IRBs: reflections after analyzing the United States' IRB registration database.
    Vulcano DM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Apr; 7(2):34-6. PubMed ID: 22565581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Informed consent for research on stored blood and tissue samples: a survey of institutional review board practices.
    White MT; Gamm J
    Account Res; 2002; 9(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 12705242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practice-based research network studies and institutional review boards: two new issues.
    Yawn BP; Graham DG; Bertram SL; Kurland MJ; Dietrich AJ; Wollan PC; Brandt EC; Huff JM; Pace WD
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2009; 22(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 19587261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Papp KK; Durning SJ
    Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):590-5. PubMed ID: 18520468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research.
    DuBois JM
    Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 16625734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDA seeks tighter controls over research with human subjects.
    Hershey N; Miller RD
    Hosp Med Staff; 1978 Dec; 7(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 10239337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anonymous self-evaluation of performance by ethics board members: a pilot study.
    Feldman JA; Rebholz CM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Mar; 4(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 19382879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FDA overview and current challenges in regulation of human subject protection. Food and Drug Administration.
    Nightingale SL
    J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care; 1997 Jan; 3(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 11363959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of central institutional review boards for multicenter clinical trials in the United States: a review of the literature.
    Check DK; Weinfurt KP; Dombeck CB; Kramer JM; Flynn KE
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):560-7. PubMed ID: 23666951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancing communication among data monitoring committees and institutional review boards.
    Taylor HA; Chaisson L; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18559418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators and institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
    Gogtay NJ; Doshi BM; Kannan S; Thatte U
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2011; 8(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 22106658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional review board guidance on pediatric research: missed opportunities.
    Wolf LE; Zandecki J; Lo B
    J Pediatr; 2005 Jul; 147(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 16027701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do IRB members make decisions? A review and research agenda.
    Pritchard IA
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Jun; 6(2):31-46. PubMed ID: 21680975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Mechaber AJ; Eacker A; Harper W; Massie FS; Power DV; Shanafelt TD
    Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):654-60. PubMed ID: 17595560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protection of human subjects; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--Food and Drug Administration. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1981 Jan; 46(17 pt 2):8958-79. PubMed ID: 10249529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal commissions and local IRBs.
    Yesley MS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.