353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22722691)
1. The privacy-reciprocity connection in biobanking: comparing German with UK strategies.
Hobbs A; Starkbaum J; Gottweis U; Wichmann HE; Gottweis H
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):272-84. PubMed ID: 22722691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.
Whitley EA; Kanellopoulou N; Kaye J
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):232-42. PubMed ID: 22722687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What Potential Donors in Research Biobanking Want to Know: A Large Population Study of the Italian Twin Registry.
Toccaceli V; Brescianini S; Fagnani C; Gigantesco A; D'Abramo F; Stazi MA
Biopreserv Biobank; 2016 Dec; 14(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27327227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. IT solutions for privacy protection in biobanking.
Eder J; Gottweis H; Zatloukal K
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):254-62. PubMed ID: 22722689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research.
Kaufman DJ; Murphy-Bollinger J; Scott J; Hudson KL
Am J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 85(5):643-54. PubMed ID: 19878915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The necessity of broad consent and complementary regulations for the protection of personal data in biobanks: what can we learn from the German case?
Taupitz J; Weigel J
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 22722690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public perceptions of cohort studies and biobanks in Germany.
Starkbaum J; Gottweis H; Gottweis U; Kleiser C; Linseisen J; Meisinger C; Kamtsiuris P; Moebus S; Jöckel KH; Börm S; Wichmann HE
Biopreserv Biobank; 2014 Apr; 12(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 24749879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genes, cells, and biobanks: Yes, there's still a consent problem.
Caulfield T; Murdoch B
PLoS Biol; 2017 Jul; 15(7):e2002654. PubMed ID: 28742850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Mercaldo ND; Clayton EW; Antommaria AHM; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Campos D; Carrell DS; Connolly J; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner TE; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; McManus VD; Myers MF; Scrol A; Williams JL; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Smith ME; Holm IA
Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 100(3):414-427. PubMed ID: 28190457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biobanking in Israel 2016-17; expressed perceptions versus real life enrollment.
Koren G; Beller D; Laifenfeld D; Grossman I; Shalev V
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 29149849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. For what am I participating? The need for communication after receiving consent from biobanking project participants: experience in Japan.
Watanabe M; Inoue Y; Chang C; Hong H; Kobayashi I; Suzuki S; Muto K
J Hum Genet; 2011 May; 56(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 21390038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biobank research and the right to privacy.
Ursin LO
Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(4):267-85. PubMed ID: 18855123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance?
D'Abramo F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Nov; 69(11):1125-8. PubMed ID: 25669218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Public perceptions of biobanks in China: a focus group study.
Chen H; Gottweis H; Starkbaum J
Biopreserv Biobank; 2013 Oct; 11(5):267-71. PubMed ID: 24835257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical challenges in biobanking: moving the agenda forward in India.
Vaz M; Vaz M; Srinivasan K
Indian J Med Ethics; 2014 Apr; 11(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 24727618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries.
Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Biobanks: in the interests of researchers or donors?].
Taupitz J; Schreiber M
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2016 Mar; 59(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 26753863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paediatric biobanking: Dutch experts reflecting on appropriate legal standards for practice.
Kranendonk EJ; Hennekam RC; Ploem MC
Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jan; 176(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 27866271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.
Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
