These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22723469)

  • 1. Comparison of nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza detection in adults.
    Irving SA; Vandermause MF; Shay DK; Belongia EA
    Clin Med Res; 2012 Nov; 10(4):215-8. PubMed ID: 22723469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy and Discomfort of Different Types of Intranasal Specimen Collection Methods for Molecular Influenza Testing in Emergency Department Patients.
    Frazee BW; Rodríguez-Hoces de la Guardia A; Alter H; Chen CG; Fuentes EL; Holzer AK; Lolas M; Mitra D; Vohra J; Dekker CL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2018 Apr; 71(4):509-517.e1. PubMed ID: 29174837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the Quidel QuickVue test for detection of influenza A and B viruses in the pediatric emergency medicine setting by use of three specimen collection methods.
    Agoritsas K; Mack K; Bonsu BK; Goodman D; Salamon D; Marcon MJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2638-41. PubMed ID: 16825402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acceptability and validity of self-collected nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection among older adults in Thailand.
    Goyal S; Prasert K; Praphasiri P; Chittaganpitch M; Waicharoen S; Ditsungnoen D; Jaichuang S; Lindblade KA
    Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2017 Sep; 11(5):412-417. PubMed ID: 28741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of four clinical specimen types for detection of influenza A and B viruses by optical immunoassay (FLU OIA test) and cell culture methods.
    Covalciuc KA; Webb KH; Carlson CA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Dec; 37(12):3971-4. PubMed ID: 10565916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing nose-throat swabs and nasopharyngeal aspirates collected from children with symptoms for respiratory virus identification using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Lambert SB; Whiley DM; O'Neill NT; Andrews EC; Canavan FM; Bletchly C; Siebert DJ; Sloots TP; Nissen MD
    Pediatrics; 2008 Sep; 122(3):e615-20. PubMed ID: 18725388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consistency of influenza A virus detection test results across respiratory specimen collection methods using real-time reverse transcription-PCR.
    Spencer S; Gaglani M; Naleway A; Reynolds S; Ball S; Bozeman S; Henkle E; Meece J; Vandermause M; Clipper L; Thompson M
    J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Nov; 51(11):3880-2. PubMed ID: 24108606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of a commercial qualitative real-time RT-PCR kit with direct immunofluorescence assay (DFA) and cell culture for detection of influenza A and B in children.
    Gharabaghi F; Tellier R; Cheung R; Collins C; Broukhanski G; Drews SJ; Richardson SE
    J Clin Virol; 2008 Jun; 42(2):190-3. PubMed ID: 18374630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a novel rapid TRC assay for the detection of influenza using nasopharyngeal swabs and gargle samples.
    Kaku N; Hashiguchi K; Akamatsu N; Wakigawa F; Matsuda J; Komaru K; Nakao T; Harada Y; Hara A; Uno N; Sakamoto K; Morinaga Y; Kitazaki T; Hasegawa H; Miyazaki T; Fukuda M; Izumikawa K; Mukae H; Yanagihara K
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Aug; 40(8):1743-1748. PubMed ID: 33594599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of a pilot study using self-collected mid-turbinate nasal swabs for detection of influenza virus infection among pregnant women.
    Thompson MG; Ferber JR; Odouli R; David D; Shifflett P; Meece JK; Naleway AL; Bozeman S; Spencer SM; Fry AM; Li DK
    Influenza Other Respir Viruses; 2015 May; 9(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 25711978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of combined nose-throat swabs with nasopharyngeal aspirates for detection of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 virus by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR.
    de la Tabla VO; Masiá M; Antequera P; Martin C; Gazquez G; Buñuel F; Gutiérrez F
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Oct; 48(10):3492-5. PubMed ID: 20702662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the point-of-care Becton Dickinson Veritor™ Rapid influenza diagnostic test in Kenya, 2013-2014.
    Ndegwa LK; Emukule G; Uyeki TM; Mailu E; Chaves SS; Widdowson MA; Lewa BV; Muiruri FK; Omoth P; Fields B; Mott JA
    BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Jan; 17(1):60. PubMed ID: 28077093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel PCR-based point-of-care method facilitates rapid, efficient, and sensitive diagnosis of influenza virus infection.
    Schmidt RLJ; Simon A; Popow-Kraupp T; Laggner A; Haslacher H; Fritzer-Szekeres M; Redlberger-Fritz M; Mayer FJ
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2019 Aug; 25(8):1032-1037. PubMed ID: 30583060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical performance of a rapid influenza test and comparison of nasal versus throat swabs to detect 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in Thai children.
    Suntarattiwong P; Jarman RG; Levy J; Baggett HC; Gibbons RV; Chotpitayasunondh T; Simmerman JM
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2010 Apr; 29(4):366-7. PubMed ID: 19949356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of PCR testing of ethanol-fixed nasal swab specimens as an augmented surveillance strategy for influenza virus and adenovirus identification.
    Krafft AE; Russell KL; Hawksworth AW; McCall S; Irvine M; Daum LT; Connoly JL; Reid AH; Gaydos JC; Taubenberger JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 43(4):1768-75. PubMed ID: 15814997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exhaled breath condensate appears to be an unsuitable specimen type for the detection of influenza viruses with nucleic acid-based methods.
    St George K; Fuschino ME; Mokhiber K; Triner W; Spivack SD
    J Virol Methods; 2010 Jan; 163(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 19733195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flocked nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate in adult emergency room patients: similar multiplex PCR respiratory pathogen results and patient discomfort.
    Hansen KB; Westin J; Andersson LM; Lindh M; Widell A; Nilsson AC
    Infect Dis (Lond); 2016; 48(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 26466764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and nasopharyngeal wash collection methods for respiratory virus detection in hospitalized children using real-time polymerase chain reaction.
    Debyle C; Bulkow L; Miernyk K; Chikoyak L; Hummel KB; Hennessy T; Singleton R
    J Virol Methods; 2012 Oct; 185(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 22728277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence of influenza virus among the paediatric population in Mumbai during 2007-2009.
    Roy S; Patil D; Dahake R; Mukherjee S; Athlekar SV; Deshmukh RA; Chowdhary A
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2012; 30(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 22664429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of nasal and nasopharyngeal swab collection for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Coghill AE; Wang CP; Verkuijilen SAWM; Yu KJ; Hsu WL; Middeldorp JM; Hildesheim A
    J Med Virol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):191-195. PubMed ID: 28833336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.