BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22724313)

  • 1. Effect of prior probability quality on biased time-delay estimation.
    Byram BC; Trahey GE; Palmeri ML
    Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Apr; 34(2):65-80. PubMed ID: 22724313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian speckle tracking. Part II: biased ultrasound displacement estimation.
    Byram B; Trahey GE; Palmeri M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):144-57. PubMed ID: 23287921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian speckle tracking. Part I: an implementable perturbation to the likelihood function for ultrasound displacement estimation.
    Byram B; Trahey GE; Palmeri M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 23287920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biased Cramér-Rao lower bound calculations for inequality-constrained estimators.
    Matson CL; Haji A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2006 Nov; 23(11):2702-13. PubMed ID: 17047695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors in biased estimators for parametric ultrasonic imaging.
    Chaturvedi P; Insana MF
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Feb; 17(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 9617907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias-corrected maximum-likelihood estimation of multiplicity of infection and lineage frequencies.
    Hashemi M; Schneider KA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261889. PubMed ID: 34965279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of exposure-specific risks from two independent samples: a simulation study.
    Reichmann WM; Gagnon D; Horsburgh CR; Losina E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():1. PubMed ID: 21208427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An adaptive displacement estimation algorithm for improved reconstruction of thermal strain.
    Ding X; Dutta D; Mahmoud AM; Tillman B; Leers SA; Kim K
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Jan; 62(1):138-51. PubMed ID: 25585398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the performance of time-delay estimators in medical ultrasound.
    Viola F; Walker WF
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2003 Apr; 50(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 12744395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Performance of Time Domain Displacement Estimators for Magnetomotive Ultrasound Imaging.
    Ersepke T; Kranemann TC; Schmitz G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 May; 66(5):911-921. PubMed ID: 30869613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-precision frequency estimator by using discrete Fourier transform and asymmetric discrete time Fourier transform samples.
    Wu H; Fan L; Song H; Jin J; Li P; Lan Z
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2023 May; 94(5):. PubMed ID: 37232939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unbiased K-L estimator for the linear regression model.
    Aladeitan B; Lukman AF; Davids E; Oranye EH; Kibria GBM
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():832. PubMed ID: 35186270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum-likelihood estimation of relatedness.
    Milligan BG
    Genetics; 2003 Mar; 163(3):1153-67. PubMed ID: 12663552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Efficient Frequency Estimator for a Complex Exponential Signal Based on Interpolation of Selectable DTFT Samples.
    Wei M; Zhang A; Qi L; Li B; Sun J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the log-normal mean.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2251-64. PubMed ID: 9802182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unbiased estimation for response adaptive clinical trials.
    Bowden J; Trippa L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2376-2388. PubMed ID: 26265771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Necessary conditions for a maximum likelihood estimate to become asymptotically unbiased and attain the Cramer-Rao lower bound. Part I. General approach with an application to time-delay and Doppler shift estimation.
    Naftali E; Makris NC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):1917-30. PubMed ID: 11681372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Collaborative targeted maximum likelihood for time to event data.
    Stitelman OM; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 21. PubMed ID: 21969976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A generalized Cramér-Rao lower bound for moving arrays.
    Sullivan EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):EL51-7. PubMed ID: 19206832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.