298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22724530)
1. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system.
Siler-Evans K; Azevedo IL; Morgan MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 May; 46(9):4742-8. PubMed ID: 22486733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach.
Lee M
J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 15993533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The benefits and costs of reducing emissions from the electricity sector.
Palmer K; Burtraw D; Shih JS
J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):115-30. PubMed ID: 16716494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States.
Levy JI; Baxter LK; Schwartz J
Risk Anal; 2009 Jul; 29(7):1000-14. PubMed ID: 19392676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
Sioshansi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supply curves for using powder river basin coal to reduce sulfur emissions.
Malvadkar SB; Smith D; McGurl GV
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2004 Jun; 54(6):741-9. PubMed ID: 15242153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
Rubin ES; Zhai H
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
Whittington HW
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.
Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R
Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvements in the operation of SO2 scrubbers in China's coal power plants.
Xu Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 45(2):380-5. PubMed ID: 21126067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Costs for integrating wind into the future ERCOT system with related costs for savings in CO2 emissions.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Sluzas NA
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3160-6. PubMed ID: 21375280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Options for near-term phaseout of CO(2) emissions from coal use in the United States.
Kharecha PA; Kutscher CF; Hansen JE; Mazria E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(11):4050-62. PubMed ID: 20429611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
