These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22724578)

  • 41. Spectrally enhanced imaging of occlusal surfaces and artificial shallow enamel erosions with a scanning fiber endoscope.
    Zhang L; Nelson LY; Seibel EJ
    J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jul; 17(7):076019. PubMed ID: 22894502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro wear of primary and permanent enamel. Simultaneous erosion and abrasion.
    Correr GM; Alonso RC; Consani S; Puppin-Rontani RM; Ferracane JL
    Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 18269132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efficacy of waiting periods and topical fluoride treatment on toothbrush abrasion of eroded enamel in situ.
    Ganss C; Schlueter N; Friedrich D; Klimek J
    Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 17284917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Application of the specular and diffuse reflection analysis for in vitro diagnostics of dental erosion: correlation with enamel softening, roughness, and calcium release.
    Rakhmatullina E; Bossen A; Höschele C; Wang X; Beyeler B; Meier C; Lussi A
    J Biomed Opt; 2011 Oct; 16(10):107002. PubMed ID: 22029364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact.
    Suzuki S
    Am J Dent; 2004 Oct; 17(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 15575451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of configuration factor on shear bond strengths of self-etch adhesive systems to ground enamel and dentin.
    Mcleod ME; Price RB; Felix CM
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 20166415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching.
    Lührs AK; Guhr S; Schilke R; Borchers L; Geurtsen W; Günay H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 18435189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inhibition of lesion progression by the penetration of resins in vitro: influence of the application procedure.
    Mueller J; Meyer-Lueckel H; Paris S; Hopfenmuller W; Kielbassa AM
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 16802642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Scanning microscopy of cervical erosion.
    Brady JM; Woody RD
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1977 Apr; 94(4):726-9. PubMed ID: 265335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro enamel thickness measurements with ultrasound.
    Sindi KH; Bubb NL; Gutteridge DL; Evans JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):301-8. PubMed ID: 25438856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ultrasonic measurement of enamel thickness: a tool for monitoring dental erosion?
    Huysmans MC; Thijssen JM
    J Dent; 2000 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 10709340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accuracy of ultrasound measurement of progressive change in occlusal enamel thickness.
    Bozkurt FO; Tagtekin DA; Hayran O; Stookey GK; Yanikoglu FC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jan; 99(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 15599355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The threshold of an intra oral scanner to measure lesion depth on natural unpolished teeth.
    Charalambous P; O'Toole S; Austin R; Bartlett D
    Dent Mater; 2022 Aug; 38(8):1354-1361. PubMed ID: 35750507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Assessment of a procedure for detecting minute levels of tooth erosion.
    Mitchell HL; Chadwick RG; Ward S; Manton SL
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2003 Jul; 41(4):464-9. PubMed ID: 12892370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The measurement threshold and limitations of an intra-oral scanner on polished human enamel.
    Charalambous P; O'Toole S; Bull T; Bartlett D; Austin R
    Dent Mater; 2021 Apr; 37(4):648-654. PubMed ID: 33573841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vivo reproducibility study of ultrasound for monitoring enamel thickness.
    Sindi KH; Bubb NL; Evans JA; Gutteridge DL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2014 Jul; 118(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 24908603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The reproducibility of ultrasonic enamel thickness measurements: an in vitro study.
    Louwerse C; Kjaeldgaard M; Huysmans MC
    J Dent; 2004 Jan; 32(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 14659722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Linear interpolation error in measured surfaces in a dental erosion study.
    Mitchell HL; Koch I; Chadwick RG
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2004 Jan; 42(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 14977229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Determination of the spectrally resolved extinction coefficient of human dental enamel using collimated transmission spectroscopy.
    Pink K; Hein S; Foschum F; Kienle A
    Dent Mater; 2022 Oct; 38(10):1661-1668. PubMed ID: 36085084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Metrology of optically-unresolved features using interferometric surface profiling and RCWA modeling.
    de Groot P; Colonna de Lega X; Liesener J; Darwin M
    Opt Express; 2008 Mar; 16(6):3970-5. PubMed ID: 18542494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.