These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272585)

  • 1. [Perception of the blind spot with Rauschfeld campimetry. An additional diagnostic criterion in papillary changes].
    Aulhorn E; Schiefer U; Herzau V
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 2272585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Results of Rauschfeld examinations with the Tübingen electronic campimeter. A comparison with current perimetry procedures].
    Schiefer U; Köst G; Aulhorn E
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(5):508-15. PubMed ID: 2272584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [White-noise field campimetry before and after artificial increase of intraocular pressure. Possible applications in diagnosis and evaluation of glaucoma].
    Schiefer U; Ulrich WD; Ulrich C; Wilhelm H; Aulhorn E
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):477-88. PubMed ID: 1486264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [White noise field campimetry. A new form of perimetric examination].
    Aulhorn E; Köst G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 192(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 3404938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects using masking campimetry].
    Damm G; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):838-42. PubMed ID: 1794816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Sensitivity of noise field campimetry as a screening method for glaucoma].
    Gramer E; Roesen B; Siebert M
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 1757045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sensitivity and specificity of masked field campimetry].
    Schiefer U; Pfau U; Selbmann HK; Wilhelm H; Zrenner E
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Apr; 92(2):156-67. PubMed ID: 7780274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A new white-noise campimeter].
    Schiefer U; Stercken-Sorrenti G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Jan; 202(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 8464208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
    Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Procedures for the quantitative follow-up control of computerized perimetric findings in glaucoma].
    Grehn F; Burkard G
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1988 Nov; 193(5):493-8. PubMed ID: 3210646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of extensive visual field defects with computer-assisted kinetic perimetry].
    Schiefer U; Schiller J; Paetzold J; Dietrich TJ; Vonthein R; Besch D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Jan; 218(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11225394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scotoma perception in white-noise-field campimetry and postchiasmal visual pathway lesions.
    Kolb M; Petersen D; Schiefer U; Kolb R; Skalej M
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 Jul; 4(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 7492935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma.
    Fortune B; Demirel S; Zhang X; Hood DC; Patterson E; Jamil A; Mansberger SL; Cioffi GA; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual fields: simplified screening and recording procedures.
    Vandeveer MR; Norden LC
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):457-64. PubMed ID: 6602825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Use of graphic analysis of topographic trends in perimetry].
    Weber J; Krieglstein GK
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1990; 87(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 2086415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Octopus perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic diseases. A contribution to the problem of optimal program choice based on 427 cases].
    Graf M; Meienberg O
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Jun; 198(6):530-7. PubMed ID: 1895723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Noise field findings in 24 patients with coronary heart disease].
    Erb C; Hettesheimer H; Stübiger N; Voelker W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2000 Nov; 217(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 11146825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Humphrey visual field and frequency doubling perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Chandrasekhar G; Kunjam V; Rao VS; Nutheti R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 51(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12701860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.