211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22726575)
1. Freestanding midwifery units versus obstetric units: does the effect of place of birth differ with level of social disadvantage?
Overgaard C; Fenger-Grøn M; Sandall J
BMC Public Health; 2012 Jun; 12():478. PubMed ID: 22726575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
Christensen LF; Overgaard C
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Freestanding midwifery unit versus obstetric unit: a matched cohort study of outcomes in low-risk women.
Overgaard C; Møller AM; Fenger-Grøn M; Knudsen LB; Sandall J
BMJ Open; 2011 Jan; 1(2):e000262. PubMed ID: 22021892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of intrapartum interventions and adverse outcomes by parity in planned freestanding midwifery unit and alongside midwifery unit births: secondary analysis of 'low risk' births in the birthplace in England cohort.
Hollowell J; Li Y; Bunch K; Brocklehurst P
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):95. PubMed ID: 28320352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of birthplace on women's birth experiences and perceptions of care.
Overgaard C; Fenger-Grøn M; Sandall J
Soc Sci Med; 2012 Apr; 74(7):973-81. PubMed ID: 22326105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploration of preterm birth rates associated with different models of antenatal midwifery care in Scotland: Unmatched retrospective cohort analysis.
Symon A; Winter C; Cochrane L
Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 25819706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transfers of women planning birth in midwifery units: data from the birthplace prospective cohort study.
Rowe RE; Fitzpatrick R; Hollowell J; Kurinczuk JJ
BJOG; 2012 Aug; 119(9):1081-90. PubMed ID: 22702241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.
Monk A; Tracy M; Foureur M; Grigg C; Tracy S
BMJ Open; 2014 Oct; 4(10):e006252. PubMed ID: 25361840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Duration and urgency of transfer in births planned at home and in freestanding midwifery units in England: secondary analysis of the birthplace national prospective cohort study.
Rowe RE; Townend J; Brocklehurst P; Knight M; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Newburn M; Redshaw M; Sandall J; Silverton L; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Dec; 13():224. PubMed ID: 24314134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study.
; Brocklehurst P; Hardy P; Hollowell J; Linsell L; Macfarlane A; McCourt C; Marlow N; Miller A; Newburn M; Petrou S; Puddicombe D; Redshaw M; Rowe R; Sandall J; Silverton L; Stewart M
BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7400. PubMed ID: 22117057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perinatal outcomes of women intending to give birth in birth centers in Australia.
Laws PJ; Tracy SK; Sullivan EA
Birth; 2010 Mar; 37(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20402719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women׳s birthplace decision-making, the role of confidence: Part of the Evaluating Maternity Units study, New Zealand.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Daellenbach R; Kensington M
Midwifery; 2015 Jun; 31(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 25765744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Tracy M; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Monk A; Schmied V
BMJ Open; 2017 Aug; 7(8):e016288. PubMed ID: 28851782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An exploration of influences on women's birthplace decision-making in New Zealand: a mixed methods prospective cohort within the Evaluating Maternity Units study.
Grigg C; Tracy SK; Daellenbach R; Kensington M; Schmied V
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Jun; 14():210. PubMed ID: 24951093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Birthplace choices: what are the information needs of women when choosing where to give birth in England? A qualitative study using online and face to face focus groups.
Hinton L; Dumelow C; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):12. PubMed ID: 29310599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer.
Monk AR; Grigg CP; Foureur M; Tracy M; Tracy SK
Midwifery; 2017 Mar; 46():24-28. PubMed ID: 28126592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What influences birth place preferences, choices and decision-making amongst healthy women with straightforward pregnancies in the UK? A qualitative evidence synthesis using a 'best fit' framework approach.
Coxon K; Chisholm A; Malouf R; Rowe R; Hollowell J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Mar; 17(1):103. PubMed ID: 28359258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Women's experiences of transfer from primary maternity unit to tertiary hospital in New Zealand: part of the prospective cohort Evaluating Maternity Units study.
Grigg CP; Tracy SK; Schmied V; Monk A; Tracy MB
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():339. PubMed ID: 26679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
