These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272681)
21. Results of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study five years after surgery. The Perk Study Group. Waring GO; Lynn MJ; Nizam A; Kutner MH; Cowden JW; Culbertson W; Laibson PR; McDonald MB; Nelson JD; Obstbaum SA Ophthalmology; 1991 Aug; 98(8):1164-76. PubMed ID: 1923352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Radial keratotomy: analysis of undercorrected patients, based on 200 successive operations]. Durand L; Monnot JP; Burillon C J Fr Ophtalmol; 1991; 14(4):211-7. PubMed ID: 1955647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Radial keratotomy for the purpose of reducing glasses power in high myopia. Pak KH; Kim JH Korean J Ophthalmol; 1992 Dec; 6(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 1301451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spectacle and contact lens wearing six years after radial keratotomy in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy Study. Bourque LB; Lynn MJ; Waring GO; Cartwright C Ophthalmology; 1994 Mar; 101(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 8127562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Relationship between refractive error and visual acuity in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Santos VR; Waring GO; Lynn MJ; Holladay JT; Sperduto RD Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Jan; 105(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 3800751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A consecutive series (1982-1985) of radial keratotomies performed with the diamond blade. Deitz MR; Sanders DR; Raanan MG Am J Ophthalmol; 1987 Mar; 103(3 Pt 2):417-22. PubMed ID: 3826258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radial keratotomy: analysis of efficacy and predictability in 1,058 consecutive cases. Part I: Efficacy. Shepard DD J Cataract Refract Surg; 1986 Nov; 12(6):632-43. PubMed ID: 3783469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Subregions of differing refractive power within the clear zone after experimental radial keratotomy. Lopez PF; Maloney RK; Goodman GG; Stark WJ Refract Corneal Surg; 1991; 7(5):360-7. PubMed ID: 1958622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Ginsburg AP; Waring GO; Steinberg EB; Williams PA; Justin N; Deitz JR; Roszka-Duggan VK; Baluvelt K; Bourque L Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 2248920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Morning-to-evening change in refraction, corneal curvature, and visual acuity 11 years after radial keratotomy in the prospective evaluation of radial keratotomy study. The PERK Study Group. McDonnell PJ; Nizam A; Lynn MJ; Waring GO Ophthalmology; 1996 Feb; 103(2):233-9. PubMed ID: 8594507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Refractive results of radial keratotomy after 10 years. Charpentier DY; Garcia P; Grunewald F; Brousse D; Duplessix M; David T J Refract Surg; 1998; 14(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 9866105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]