1005 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22727356)
21. Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites.
Debnath S; Ranade R; Wunder SL; McCool J; Boberick K; Baran G
Dent Mater; 2004 Sep; 20(7):677-86. PubMed ID: 15236943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Finite element 3D modeling of mechanical behavior of mineralized collagen microfibrils.
Barkaoui A; Hambli R
J Appl Biomater Biomech; 2011; 9(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 22139755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types.
Leprince J; Palin WM; Mullier T; Devaux J; Vreven J; Leloup G
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 May; 37(5):364-76. PubMed ID: 20202096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Experimental and computational approach for evaluating the mechanical characteristics of dental composite resins with various filler sizes.
Tanimoto Y; Kitagawa T; Aida M; Nishiyama N
Acta Biomater; 2006 Nov; 2(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 16950668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Enamel and dentin as multi-scale bio-composites.
Bar-On B; Daniel Wagner H
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Aug; 12():174-83. PubMed ID: 22762906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites.
Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):694-9. PubMed ID: 17767952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mechanical behavior of post-restored upper canine teeth: a 3D FE analysis.
Ausiello P; Franciosa P; Martorelli M; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1285-94. PubMed ID: 22000641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of resin composite polymerization by three dimensional micro-CT imaging and nanoindentation.
Cho E; Sadr A; Inai N; Tagami J
Dent Mater; 2011 Nov; 27(11):1070-8. PubMed ID: 21820729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Polymerization stress of resin composites as a function of system compliance.
Gonçalves F; Pfeifer CS; Meira JB; Ballester RY; Lima RG; Braga RR
Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):645-52. PubMed ID: 17719626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites.
Papadogiannis DY; Lakes RS; Papadogiannis Y; Palaghias G; Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 17640723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of customized composite resin fibreglass posts on the mechanics of restored treated teeth.
Anchieta RB; Rocha EP; Almeida EO; Freitas AC; Martin M; Martini AP; Archangelo CM; Ko CC
Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 22070803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of flexural properties and surface roughness of nanohybrid and microhybrid dental composites.
Melander J; Dunn WP; Link MP; Wang Y; Xu C; Walker MP
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):342-7; quiz 348-9. PubMed ID: 22313818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The apparent increase of the Young's modulus in thin cement layers.
De Jager N; Pallav P; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 15081552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Shrinkage behaviour of flowable resin-composites related to conversion and filler-fraction.
Baroudi K; Saleh AM; Silikas N; Watts DC
J Dent; 2007 Aug; 35(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 17597283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A model of the viscoelastic behavior of flowable resin composites prior to setting.
Petrovic LM; Zorica DM; Stojanac ILj; Krstonosic VS; Hadnadjev MS; Atanackovic TM
Dent Mater; 2013 Sep; 29(9):929-34. PubMed ID: 23899386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of joint component mechanical properties and adhesive layer thickness on stress distribution in micro-tensile bond strength specimens.
Neves Ade A; Coutinho E; Poitevin A; Van der Sloten J; Van Meerbeek B; Van Oosterwyck H
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 18554711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Numerical study of pressure relationships between sample and calibrant inside the diamond anvil cell.
Conil N; Kavner A
J Phys Condens Matter; 2006 Jun; 18(25):S1039-47. PubMed ID: 22611094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of system compliance and sample geometry on composite polymerization shrinkage stress.
Laughlin GA; Williams JL; Eick JD
J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(5):671-8. PubMed ID: 12209915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Measurement at low strain rates of the elastic properties of dental polymeric materials.
Chabrier F; Lloyd CH; Scrimgeour SN
Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10483393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Understanding contradictory data in contraction stress tests.
Meira JB; Braga RR; Ballester RY; Tanaka CB; Versluis A
J Dent Res; 2011 Mar; 90(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 21098474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
