289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22727737)
1. Validity of cancer diagnosis in a primary care database compared with linked cancer registrations in England. Population-based cohort study.
Dregan A; Moller H; Murray-Thomas T; Gulliford MC
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 22727737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of esophageal cancer in the General Practice Research Database.
Walker AM
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1159-67. PubMed ID: 21928362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries.
Boggon R; van Staa TP; Chapman M; Gallagher AM; Hammad TA; Richards MA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Feb; 22(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 23239282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Record linkage of a large clinical practice patient cohort with the Cancer Registry Schleswig-Holstein].
Obi N; Waldmann A; Babaev V; Katalinic A
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Jul; 73(7):452-8. PubMed ID: 20549597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation, precision and validity of 1-year survival estimates for lung, breast, colon and prostate cancer in South East England primary care trusts.
Lake J; Mak V; Møller H; Davies EA
Public Health; 2012 Jan; 126(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22153886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying incident colorectal and lung cancer cases in health service utilisation databases in Australia: a validation study.
Goldsbury D; Weber M; Yap S; Banks E; O'Connell DL; Canfell K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Feb; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28241763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Linkage of secondary data with cancer registry data on the basis of encrypted personal identifiers - results from a pilot study in North Rhine-Westphalia].
Kajüter H; Batzler WU; Krieg V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Aug; 74(8-9):e84-9. PubMed ID: 22836935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Epidemiological data sources in Estonia: a survey of registries and databases.
Innos K; Rahu M
J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 11142605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the predictive value of Read/OXMIS codes to identify incident acute myocardial infarction in the General Practice Research Database.
Hammad TA; McAdams MA; Feight A; Iyasu S; Dal Pan GJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1197-201. PubMed ID: 18985705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and completeness of colorectal cancer diagnoses in a primary care database in the United Kingdom.
Cea Soriano L; Soriano-Gabarró M; García Rodríguez LA
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Apr; 25(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 26436320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Completeness and diagnostic validity of recording acute myocardial infarction events in primary care, hospital care, disease registry, and national mortality records: cohort study.
Herrett E; Shah AD; Boggon R; Denaxas S; Smeeth L; van Staa T; Timmis A; Hemingway H
BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f2350. PubMed ID: 23692896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of cancer diagnosis in the National Health Insurance database compared with the linked National Cancer Registry in Taiwan.
Kao WH; Hong JH; See LC; Yu HP; Hsu JT; Chou IJ; Chou WC; Chiou MJ; Wang CC; Kuo CF
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1060-1066. PubMed ID: 28815803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal cancer incidence on the General Practice Research Database.
Charlton R; Snowball J; Bloomfield K; de Vries C
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jul; 21(7):775-783. PubMed ID: 22383247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and completeness of the General Practice Research Database for studies of inflammatory bowel disease.
Lewis JD; Brensinger C; Bilker WB; Strom BL
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002; 11(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 12051120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Record linkage for pharmacoepidemiological studies in cancer patients.
Herk-Sukel MP; Lemmens VE; Poll-Franse LV; Herings RM; Coebergh JW
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Jan; 21(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 21812067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation study of colorectal cancer diagnosis in the Spanish primary care database, BIFAP.
Gil M; Rodríguez-Miguel A; Montoya-Catalá H; González-González R; Álvarez-Gutiérrez A; Rodríguez-Martín S; García-Rodríguez LA; de Abajo FJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Feb; 28(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 30548462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility and validity of The Health Improvement Network database of primary care electronic health records to identify and characterise patients with small cell lung cancer in the United Kingdom.
Cea Soriano L; Zong J; García Rodríguez LA
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jan; 19(1):91. PubMed ID: 30665371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New opportunities for drug outcomes research in cancer patients: the linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and the PHARMO Record Linkage System.
van Herk-Sukel MP; van de Poll-Franse LV; Lemmens VE; Vreugdenhil G; Pruijt JF; Coebergh JW; Herings RM
Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(2):395-404. PubMed ID: 19811904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
