These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272806)
1. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill. Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How do the Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care (DNRCC) and the Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest) protocols differ? Morris K Ohio Nurses Rev; 2001 Feb; 76(2):16. PubMed ID: 15726853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices. Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Of dead brains, living wills, and autonomy. Lehman LB Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1991 Jan; 26(1):39-42, 45-8. PubMed ID: 1898946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Carroll PR Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The case of Nancy Cruzan and ... its impact on Colorado physicians. Part I. Parsons DW Colo Med; 1991 Jan; 88(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 1997258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What are the basic provisions of California's new "Right to Die Bill?". Gordon PA Hosp Forum; 1976 Nov; 19(6):17, 22. PubMed ID: 10242087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act. Hunt WE Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legislating advance directives for the terminally ill: the living will and durable power of attorney. Martyn SR; Jacobs LB Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):779-809. PubMed ID: 16041874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984; 3(4):309-32. PubMed ID: 6541741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Where there's a will. Schroeder LO Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):417-22. PubMed ID: 1484464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. Life and death after Cruzan. Bredder R Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Jan; 45(2):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10108339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Patient Self-Determination Act: benefit or burden? Moss AH W V Med J; 1991 Nov; 87(11):510-3. PubMed ID: 1819875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]