163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272806)
1. After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill.
Hawaii Med J; 1990 Oct; 49(10):375. PubMed ID: 2272806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis.
Marzen TJ
Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cruzan: it's not over, Nancy?
Shuster E
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 2132018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
Obade CC
J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.
McLean ED
Emory Law J; 1991; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
Thomson CJ
Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How do the Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care (DNRCC) and the Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-Arrest) protocols differ?
Morris K
Ohio Nurses Rev; 2001 Feb; 76(2):16. PubMed ID: 15726853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal regulation of terminal care: options and obstacles.
Winslade WJ
Tex Med; 1991 Feb; 87(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 2031233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The California Natural Death Act: an empirical study of physicians' practices.
Redleaf DL; Schmitt SB; Thompson WC
Stanford Law Rev; 1979 May; 31(5):913-45. PubMed ID: 10243334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Of dead brains, living wills, and autonomy.
Lehman LB
Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1991 Jan; 26(1):39-42, 45-8. PubMed ID: 1898946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Carroll PR
Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The case of Nancy Cruzan and ... its impact on Colorado physicians. Part I.
Parsons DW
Colo Med; 1991 Jan; 88(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 1997258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment. Lessons from Nancy Cruzan.
Fairman RP
Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 1728924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What are the basic provisions of California's new "Right to Die Bill?".
Gordon PA
Hosp Forum; 1976 Nov; 19(6):17, 22. PubMed ID: 10242087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die in Montana: the Montana Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act.
Hunt WE
Mont Law Rev; 1993; 54(2):339-56. PubMed ID: 16180290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legislating advance directives for the terminally ill: the living will and durable power of attorney.
Martyn SR; Jacobs LB
Neb Law Rev; 1984; 63(4):779-809. PubMed ID: 16041874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
Solnick PB
Med Law; 1984; 3(4):309-32. PubMed ID: 6541741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Where there's a will.
Schroeder LO
Med Law; 1992; 11(5-6):417-22. PubMed ID: 1484464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. Life and death after Cruzan.
Bredder R
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1991 Jan; 45(2):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10108339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Patient Self-Determination Act: benefit or burden?
Moss AH
W V Med J; 1991 Nov; 87(11):510-3. PubMed ID: 1819875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
