132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22728414)
21. Wrist-Based Accelerometer Cut-Points to Identify Sedentary Time in 5⁻11-Year-Old Children.
Chandler J; Beets M; Saint-Maurice P; Weaver R; Cliff D; Drenowatz C; Moore JB; Sui M; Brazendale K
Children (Basel); 2018 Sep; 5(10):. PubMed ID: 30261646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reliability and validity of a sedentary behavior questionnaire for South American pediatric population: SAYCARE study.
De Moraes ACF; Nascimento-Ferreira MV; Forjaz CLM; Aristizabal JC; Azzaretti L; Nascimento Junior WV; Miguel-Berges ML; Skapino E; Delgado C; Moreno LA; Carvalho HB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):5. PubMed ID: 31924168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Sedentary Estimates between activPAL and Hip- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph.
Koster A; Shiroma EJ; Caserotti P; Matthews CE; Chen KY; Glynn NW; Harris TB
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 27031744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physical activity and sedentary behavior across three time-points and associations with social skills in early childhood.
Carson V; Lee EY; Hesketh KD; Hunter S; Kuzik N; Predy M; Rhodes RE; Rinaldi CM; Spence JC; Hinkley T
BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):27. PubMed ID: 30616565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of accelerometer cut points in toddlers with and without cerebral palsy.
Oftedal S; Bell KL; Davies PS; Ware RS; Boyd RN
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1808-15. PubMed ID: 25134003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of objective methods for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults: a systematic review.
Heesch KC; Hill RL; Aguilar-Farias N; van Uffelen JGZ; Pavey T
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2018 Nov; 15(1):119. PubMed ID: 30477509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time.
Lyden K; Kozey Keadle SL; Staudenmayer JW; Freedson PS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Nov; 44(11):2243-52. PubMed ID: 22648343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identification and validity of accelerometer cut-points for toddlers.
Trost SG; Fees BS; Haar SJ; Murray AD; Crowe LK
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2012 Nov; 20(11):2317-9. PubMed ID: 22173573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Empirically derived cut-points for sedentary behaviour: are we sitting differently?
Clarke-Cornwell AM; Farragher TM; Cook PA; Granat MH
Physiol Meas; 2016 Oct; 37(10):1669-1685. PubMed ID: 27652920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Validity of hip-mounted uniaxial accelerometry with heart-rate monitoring vs. triaxial accelerometry in the assessment of free-living energy expenditure in young children: the IDEFICS Validation Study.
Ojiambo R; Konstabel K; Veidebaum T; Reilly J; Verbestel V; Huybrechts I; Sioen I; Casajús JA; Moreno LA; Vicente-Rodriguez G; Bammann K; Tubic BM; Marild S; Westerterp K; Pitsiladis YP;
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2012 Nov; 113(10):1530-6. PubMed ID: 22995396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Everything you wanted to know about selecting the "right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: a systematic review.
Kim Y; Beets MW; Welk GJ
J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Jul; 15(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 22306372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the validity and reliability and determining cut-points of the Actiwatch 2 in measuring physical activity.
Kemp C; Pienaar PR; Henst RHP; Roden LC; Kolbe-Alexander TL; Rae DE
Physiol Meas; 2020 Sep; 41(8):085001. PubMed ID: 32886650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detecting prolonged sitting bouts with the ActiGraph GT3X.
Kuster RP; Grooten WJA; Baumgartner D; Blom V; Hagströmer M; Ekblom Ö
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2020 Mar; 30(3):572-582. PubMed ID: 31743494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Validity of ActiGraph 2-regression model, Matthews cut-points, and NHANES cut-points for assessing free-living physical activity.
Crouter SE; DellaValle DM; Haas JD; Frongillo EA; Bassett DR
J Phys Act Health; 2013 May; 10(4):504-14. PubMed ID: 22975460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Day-level sedentary pattern estimates derived from hip-worn accelerometer cut-points in 8-12-year-olds: Do they reflect postural transitions?
Carlson JA; Bellettiere J; Kerr J; Salmon J; Timperio A; Verswijveren SJJM; Ridgers ND
J Sports Sci; 2019 Aug; 37(16):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 31002287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sedentary Behaviour Profiling of Office Workers: A Sensitivity Analysis of Sedentary Cut-Points.
Boerema ST; Essink GB; Tönis TM; van Velsen L; Hermens HJ
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 26712758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sedentary time in children: influence of accelerometer processing on health relations.
Atkin AJ; Ekelund U; Møller NC; Froberg K; Sardinha LB; Andersen LB; Brage S
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Jun; 45(6):1097-104. PubMed ID: 23274612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 5-year changes in afterschool physical activity and sedentary behavior.
Arundell L; Ridgers ND; Veitch J; Salmon J; Hinkley T; Timperio A
Am J Prev Med; 2013 Jun; 44(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 23683978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accelerometer-derived physical activity estimation in preschoolers - comparison of cut-point sets incorporating the vector magnitude vs the vertical axis.
Leeger-Aschmann CS; Schmutz EA; Zysset AE; Kakebeeke TH; Messerli-Bürgy N; Stülb K; Arhab A; Meyer AH; Munsch S; Jenni OG; Puder JJ; Kriemler S
BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):513. PubMed ID: 31060538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility and applicability of Evenson sedentary behavior cut points applied to children with and without intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Forseth B; Papanek PE; Polfuss ML
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 May; 44(10):1996-2001. PubMed ID: 32907409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
