BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272863)

  • 1. Probability and inter-stimulus interval effects on the P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Dec; 10(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 2272863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. P300, probability, and interstimulus interval.
    Polich J
    Psychophysiology; 1990 Jul; 27(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 2236442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. P300 from a single auditory stimulus.
    Polich J; Eischen SE; Collins GE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 92(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 7514994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. P300 from auditory and somatosensory stimuli: probability and inter-stimulus interval.
    Polich J; Brock T; Geisler MW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1991 Aug; 11(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 1748598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: auditory intensity and tone frequency effects.
    Cass M; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1997 Jun; 46(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 9255431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P300 sequence effects, probability, and interstimulus interval.
    Polich J; Bondurant T
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Jun; 61(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 9177555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P300 in young and elderly subjects: auditory frequency and intensity effects.
    Vesco KK; Bone RC; Ryan JC; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 7688285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P300 from auditory stimuli: intensity and frequency effects.
    Sugg MJ; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1995 Nov; 41(3):255-69. PubMed ID: 8608203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm.
    Katayama J; Polich J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Mar; 110(3):463-8. PubMed ID: 10363770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1987 Jul; 68(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 2439311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of auditory P300 habituation from active and passive conditions.
    Polich J; McIsaac HK
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Jun; 17(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 7961051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms.
    Katayama J; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1996; 23(1-2):33-40. PubMed ID: 8880364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Normal variation of P300 in children: age, memory span, and head size.
    Polich J; Ladish C; Burns T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1990 Oct; 9(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 2276942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of infant and adult P300 from auditory stimuli.
    McIsaac H; Polich J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1992 Apr; 53(2):115-28. PubMed ID: 1578194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli.
    Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Mar; 63(3):251-9. PubMed ID: 2419083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. P300 assessment of early Alzheimer's disease.
    Polich J; Ladish C; Bloom FE
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 77(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 1691970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory P300 development from an active, passive and single-tone paradigms.
    Zenker F; Barajas JJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Aug; 33(2):99-111. PubMed ID: 10489075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. P300, probability, and introverted/extroverted personality types.
    Cahill JM; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1992 May; 33(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 1599997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. P3 varies with stimulus categorization rather than probability.
    Mecklinger A; Ullsperger P
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jun; 86(6):395-407. PubMed ID: 7686474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.