These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2272863)

  • 21. Target-to-target interval versus probability effects on P300 in one- and two-tone tasks.
    Croft RJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Gabriel C; Barry RJ
    Psychophysiology; 2003 May; 40(3):322-8. PubMed ID: 12946107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
    Pereira DR; Cardoso S; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C; Cunha-Reis C; Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Silveira C; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. P300 and probability: comparison of oddball and single-stimulus paradigms.
    Polich J; Margala C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1997 Feb; 25(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 9101341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of covert attention and stimulus complexity on the P3 response during an auditory continuous performance task.
    Shucard DW; Abara JP; McCabe DC; Benedict RB; Shucard JL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Nov; 54(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 15331213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality.
    Mertens R; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1997 Nov; 104(6):488-97. PubMed ID: 9402891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long latency event-related potentials in mice: effects of stimulus characteristics and strain.
    Ehlers CL; Somes C
    Brain Res; 2002 Dec; 957(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 12443987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The auditory P3 from passive and active three-stimulus oddball paradigm.
    Wronka E; Kaiser J; Coenen AML
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 2008; 68(3):362-72. PubMed ID: 18668159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interstimulus interval and auditory event-related potentials in children: evidence for multiple generators.
    Ceponiene R; Cheour M; Näätänen R
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 9714376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. On the relationship between background EEG and the P300 event-related potential.
    Intriligator J; Polich J
    Biol Psychol; 1994 Jul; 37(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 7948466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory ERPs to non-target stimuli in schizophrenia: relationship to probability, task-demands, and target ERPs.
    O'Donnell BF; Hokama H; McCarley RW; Smith RS; Salisbury DF; Mondrow E; Nestor PG; Shenton ME
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1994 Aug; 17(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 7806466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the validity of interblock averaging of P300 in clinical settings.
    Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT; García-Larrea L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1999 Nov; 34(2):103-12. PubMed ID: 10576395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. P300, habituation, and response mode.
    Lew GS; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Jan; 53(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 8434050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. P3(00) habituation from auditory and visual stimuli.
    Romero R; Polich J
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Mar; 59(3):517-22. PubMed ID: 8700955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ERPs to infrequent auditory stimuli in two- and three-stimulus versions of the inter-modal oddball task.
    Brown CR; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Nov; 74(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 19733601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Heart rate and P300: Integrating peripheral and central indices of cognitive processing.
    Guerra PM; Sánchez-Adam A; Miccoli L; Polich J; Vila J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Feb; 100():1-11. PubMed ID: 26724251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of complexity of visual distracters on attention and information processing speed reflected in auditory p300.
    Wilson MJ; Harkrider AW; King KA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):480-8. PubMed ID: 22343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm.
    Katayama J; Polich J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1996 Nov; 100(6):555-62. PubMed ID: 8980420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
    Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. P3-like potential in rats.
    Yamaguchi S; Globus H; Knight RT
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993; 88(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 7681756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.