BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22732026)

  • 1. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
    Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
    Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source-constrained recall: front-end and back-end control of retrieval quality.
    Halamish V; Goldsmith M; Jacoby LL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 21859234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1665-81. PubMed ID: 23565780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed.
    Kornell N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval enhances route knowledge acquisition, but only when movement errors are prevented.
    Kelly JW; Carpenter SK; Sjolund LA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1540-7. PubMed ID: 25581223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study.
    Hays MJ; Kornell N; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):290-6. PubMed ID: 22582968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.
    Karpicke JD; Bauernschmidt A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1250-7. PubMed ID: 21574747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.
    Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Meeks JT; Clark-Foos A; Hicks JL
    Memory; 2010 May; 18(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 20408041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval-induced facilitation: initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material.
    Chan JC; McDermott KB; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):553-71. PubMed ID: 17087573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
    Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.