These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22732026)

  • 21. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
    Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Paradoxical effects of testing: retrieval enhances both accurate recall and suggestibility in eyewitnesses.
    Chan JC; Langley MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):248-55. PubMed ID: 20919785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of retrieval mode and retrieval orientation in retrieval practice: insights from comparing recognition memory testing formats and restudying.
    Gao C; Rosburg T; Hou M; Li B; Xiao X; Guo C
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 16(6):977-990. PubMed ID: 27469235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal time-of-day and consolidation of learning in younger and older adults.
    Hogan MJ; Kelly CA; Verrier D; Newell J; Hasher L; Robertson IH
    Exp Aging Res; 2009; 35(1):107-28. PubMed ID: 19173105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The negative testing effect and multifactor account.
    Peterson DJ; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23421505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: another test effect.
    Bjork EL; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 21574746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Deficits in memory retrieval: an argument in favor of frontal subcortical dysfunction in depression].
    Fossati P; Deweer B; Raoux N; Allilaire JF
    Encephale; 1995; 21(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 7588169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.
    Cho KW; Neely JH; Crocco S; Vitrano D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1211-1235. PubMed ID: 27049596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of feedback and test practice on recollection and retrieval monitoring: comparing first graders, third graders, and adults.
    Moore KN; Lampinen JM; Gallo DA; Bridges AJ
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):424-438. PubMed ID: 28774228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
    Logan JM; Balota DA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Memory as discrimination: a challenge to the encoding-retrieval match principle.
    Poirier M; Nairne JS; Morin C; Zimmermann FG; Koutmeridou K; Fowler J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-29. PubMed ID: 21823814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice.
    Smith MA; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1712-25. PubMed ID: 23815513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
    Rowland CA
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using testing to improve learning after severe traumatic brain injury.
    Pastötter B; Weber J; Bäuml KH
    Neuropsychology; 2013 Mar; 27(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 23527656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of noticing in prospective memory forgetting.
    Kliegel M; Guynn MJ; Zimmer H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17113673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.